Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Autonomous artificial intelligence versus teleophthalmology for diabetic retinopathy.
Musetti, Donatella; Cutolo, Carlo Alberto; Bonetto, Monica; Giacomini, Mauro; Maggi, Davide; Viviani, Giorgio Luciano; Gandin, Ilaria; Traverso, Carlo Enrico; Nicolò, Massimo.
Affiliation
  • Musetti D; Clinica Oculistica DiNOGMI, Università di Genova, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.
  • Cutolo CA; Clinica Oculistica DiNOGMI, Università di Genova, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.
  • Bonetto M; Healthropy srl, Savona, Italy.
  • Giacomini M; DIBRIS, University of Genova, Italy.
  • Maggi D; Clinica Diabetologica, Università di Genova, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.
  • Viviani GL; Clinica Diabetologica, Università di Genova, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.
  • Gandin I; Sciences, Biostatistic Unit, University of Trieste, Italy.
  • Traverso CE; Clinica Oculistica DiNOGMI, Università di Genova, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.
  • Nicolò M; Clinica Oculistica DiNOGMI, Università di Genova, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; : 11206721241248856, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656241
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) based automated software for detection of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) compared with the evaluation of digital retinography by two double masked retina specialists.

Methods:

Two-hundred one patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years) with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. All patients were undergoing a retinography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, DRI 3D OCT-2000, Topcon) of the macula. The retinal photographs were graded using two validated AI DR screening software (Eye Art TM and IDx-DR) designed to identify more than mild DR.

Results:

Retinal images of 201 patients were graded. DR (more than mild DR) was detected by the ophthalmologists in 38 (18.9%) patients and by the AI-algorithms in 36 patients (with 30 eyes diagnosed by both algorithms). Ungradable patients by the AI software were 13 (6.5%) and 16 (8%) for the Eye Art and IDx-DR, respectively. Both AI software strategies showed a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting any more than mild DR without showing any statistically significant difference between them.

Conclusions:

The comparison between the diagnosis provided by artificial intelligence based automated software and the reference clinical diagnosis showed that they can work at a level of sensitivity that is similar to that achieved by experts.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Journal subject: OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Journal subject: OFTALMOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy Country of publication: United States