Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The association between single and dual use of cannabis and alcohol and driving under the influence and riding with an impaired driver in a large sample of Canadian adolescents.
Gohari, Mahmood R; Patte, Karen A; Elton-Marshall, Tara; Cole, Adam; Turcotte-Tremblay, Anne-Marie; Bélanger, Richard; Leatherdale, Scott T.
Affiliation
  • Gohari MR; School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
  • Patte KA; Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
  • Elton-Marshall T; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Cole A; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.
  • Turcotte-Tremblay AM; VITAM, Centre de recherche en santé durable - Université Laval, CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, Canada.
  • Bélanger R; Département de pédiatrie, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
  • Leatherdale ST; Département de pédiatrie, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 25(6): 765-773, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656911
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Dual use of cannabis and alcohol has increased in adolescents, but limited research has examined how it relates to impaired driving or riding with an impaired driver (IDR) compared to single substance use. This study aimed to examine the odds of alcohol- and/or cannabis-IDR among adolescents based on their use of alcohol and/or cannabis, and whether associations differed by gender and age.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional survey data were used from a sample of 69,621 students attending 182 Canadian secondary schools in the 2021/22 school year. Multilevel logistic regression estimated the odds of exclusive alcohol-IDR, exclusive cannabis-IDR, and both alcohol and cannabis IDR (alcohol-cannabis-IDR). Substance use interactions with gender and age were tested.

RESULTS:

Overall, 14.7% of participants reported IDR; 7.5% reported exclusive alcohol-IDR, 3.2% reported exclusive cannabis-IDR, 4.0% reported alcohol-cannabis-IDR, and 7.4% were unsure if they had experienced IDR. The prevalence of IDR varied across substance use groups, 8.0% among nonuse, 21.9% among alcohol-only use, 35.9% among cannabis-only use, and 49.6% among dual use groups. Gender diverse, older, and students with lower socioeconomic status exhibited a higher likelihood of reporting alcohol-cannabis-IDR. Dual use was significantly associated with 9.5 times higher odds of alcohol-cannabis-IDR compared to alcohol-only use, and 3.0 times higher odds compared to cannabis-only use. Dual use was also associated with an increased likelihood of either alcohol- or cannabis-IDR.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study highlights that all students, regardless of substance use, are at risk of IDR, but students engaged in dual use of alcohol and cannabis face an elevated risk compared to both peers who do not use substances and those who use only a single substance. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted interventions that address the risks associated with IDR.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Driving Under the Influence Limits: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Traffic Inj Prev Journal subject: TRAUMATOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Driving Under the Influence Limits: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Traffic Inj Prev Journal subject: TRAUMATOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada