Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early Experience with Prone Lateral Interbody Fusion in Deformity Correction: A Single-Institution Experience.
Bartlett, Alyssa M; Dibble, Christopher F; Sykes, David A W; Drossopoulos, Peter N; Wang, Timothy Y; Crutcher, Clifford L; Than, Khoi D; Bhomwick, Deb A; Shaffrey, Christopher I; Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M.
Affiliation
  • Bartlett AM; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Dibble CF; Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
  • Sykes DAW; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Drossopoulos PN; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Wang TY; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Crutcher CL; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Than KD; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Bhomwick DA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Shaffrey CI; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
  • Abd-El-Barr MM; Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
J Clin Med ; 13(8)2024 Apr 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38673552
ABSTRACT
Background/

Objectives:

Lateral spine surgery offers effective minimally invasive deformity correction, but traditional approaches often involve separate anterior, lateral, and posterior procedures. The prone lateral technique streamlines this process by allowing single-position access for lateral and posterior surgery, potentially benefiting from the lordosing effect of prone positioning. While previous studies have compared prone lateral to direct lateral for adult degenerative diseases, this retrospective review focuses on the outcomes of adult deformity patients undergoing prone lateral interbody fusion.

Methods:

Ten adult patients underwent single-position prone lateral surgery for spine deformity correction, with a mean follow-up of 18 months.

Results:

Results showed significant improvements sagittal vertical axis decreased by 2.4 cm, lumbar lordosis increased by 9.1°, pelvic tilt improved by 3.3°, segmental lordosis across the fusion construct increased by 12.2°, and coronal Cobb angle improved by 6.3°. These benefits remained consistent over the follow-up period. Correlational analysis showed a positive association between improvements in PROs and SVA and SL. When compared to hybrid approaches, prone lateral yielded greater improvements in SVA.

Conclusions:

Prone lateral surgery demonstrated favorable outcomes with reasonable perioperative risks. However, further research comparing this technique with standard minimally invasive lateral approaches, hybrid, and open approaches is warranted for a comprehensive evaluation.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Clin Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Switzerland