Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of universal adhesive pretreatments on the bond strength durability of conventional and adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramic.
Kwon, Tae-Yub; Han, Seung-Hee; Lee, Du-Hyeong; Park, Jin-Woo; Kim, Young Kyung.
Affiliation
  • Kwon TY; Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Han SH; Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee DH; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JW; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YK; Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont ; 16(2): 105-114, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694193
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pretreatment of three different universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal [SBU], All-Bond Universal [ABU], and Prime&Bond universal [PBU]) on the bonding durability of an adhesive (Panavia F 2.0, PF) and a conventional (Duo-Link, DL) resin cements to air-abraded zirconia. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Rectangular-shaped zirconia specimens were prepared. The chemical composition and surface energy parameters of the materials were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and contact angle measurement, respectively. To evaluate resin bonding to the zirconia, all the bonding specimens were immersed in water for 24 h and the specimens to be aged were additionally thermocycled 10000 times before the shear bond strength (SBS) test.

RESULTS:

The materials showed different surface energy parameters, including the degree of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity. While the DL/CON (no pretreatment) showed the lowest SBS and a significant decrease in the value after thermocycling (P < .001), the PF/CON obtained a higher SBS value than the DL/CON (P < .001) and no decrease even after thermocycling (P = .839). When the universal adhesives were used with DL, their SBS values were higher than the CON (P < .05), but the trend was adhesive-specific. In conjunction with PF, the PF/SBU produced the highest SBS followed by the PF/ABU (P = .002), showing no significant decrease after thermocycling (P > .05). The initial SBS of the PF/PBU was similar to the PF/CON (P = .999), but the value decreased after thermocycling (P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

The universal adhesive pretreatment did not necessarily show a synergistic effect on the bonding performance of an adhesive resin cement, whereas the pretreatment was beneficial to bond strength and durability of a conventional resin cement.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Adv Prosthodont Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Adv Prosthodont Year: 2024 Document type: Article