Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of tryptase and histamine for perioperative anaphylaxis: A multicenter prospective study.
Haraguchi, Takashi; Horiuchi, Tatsuo; Takazawa, Tomonori; Nagumo, Kazuhiro; Orihara, Masaki; Saito, Shigeru.
Affiliation
  • Haraguchi T; Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
  • Horiuchi T; Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
  • Takazawa T; Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan. Electronic address: takazawt@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.
  • Nagumo K; Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
  • Orihara M; Intensive Care Unit, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
  • Saito S; Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Allergol Int ; 2024 May 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724420
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) is often challenging. Although a guideline recommends measuring tryptase rather than histamine, there is little evidence for this. We aimed to examine the diagnostic performance and appropriate timing of tryptase and histamine measurements for diagnosing anaphylaxis, and the association between Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme (HCSS) scores and elevated biomarkers.

METHODS:

We measured tryptase and histamine levels thrice 30 min, 2 h, and at least 24 h after an anaphylactic event for patients with suspected anaphylaxis, and at the induction of general anesthesia and 30 min and 2 h after the start of surgery for control patients without a reaction. Absolute values and the magnitude and rate of change from baseline were evaluated. We determined the thresholds of tryptase and histamine levels with the best diagnostic performance and compared their performance.

RESULTS:

Forty-five patients with perioperative anaphylaxis were included in this study. The control group included 30 patients with uneventful general anesthesia and 12 patients with a suspected but unconfirmed diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis. Comparison at the same measurement timings showed that tryptase generally had better diagnostic performance than histamine. Both showed better diagnostic performance when assessed using multiple measurements rather than a single measurement. The best diagnostic performance was seen with the percentage change in the higher tryptase value, whether measured at 30 min or 2 h after anaphylaxis onset, as compared to baseline. However, neither tryptase nor histamine levels correlated with HCSS scores.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, tryptase showed better diagnostic performance than histamine. When multiple tryptase measurements are possible, parameters calculated using two acute phase measurements and the baseline level have better diagnostic performance.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Allergol Int Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Allergol Int Journal subject: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan