Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10-year follow-up.
Ruderman, Lindsey V; Bayoumi, Tarik; Ten Noever de Brauw, Gaby V; Lan, Ranqing; Nguyen, Joseph T; Pearle, Andrew D.
Affiliation
  • Ruderman LV; Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Bayoumi T; Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ten Noever de Brauw GV; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lan R; Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Medicine Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Nguyen JT; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Pearle AD; Biostatistics Core, Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738827
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is a lack of literature reporting on long-term outcomes following robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study assessed the long-term survivorship, patient-reported satisfaction and pain scores following robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS:

A single surgeon's database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA with a cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis prior to May 2015. Patients were contacted to determine implant survivorship, satisfaction and pain. Kaplan-Meier models were applied to analyse survival.

RESULTS:

A total of 77 knees (70 patients) with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 1.5 years (range 8.1-13.3) were included. Five knees were revised, corresponding to a 10-year survivorship of 96.1% and estimated survival time of 12.7 ± 0.3 years (95% confidence interval 12.2-13.2) with all-cause revision as the endpoint. Unexplained pain (40.0%) and progression of OA (40.0%) in contralateral compartments were the most reported reasons for revision. Among patients without revision, 94.4% were either satisfied or very satisfied with their lateral UKA and the average pain score was 1.1.

CONCLUSION:

Robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA led to high implant survivorship and patient satisfaction, and low pain scores at long-term follow-up. Progression of OA in contralateral compartments and unexplained pain were the most frequent reasons for revision. These findings support the continued use of robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment OA; however, its clinical value over conventional techniques remains to be established in prospective comparative studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Journal subject: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Journal subject: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States