A quantitative comparison of urine centrifugation and filtration for the isolation and analysis of urinary nucleic acid biomarkers.

ABSTRACT

Urine is a rich source of nucleic acid biomarkers including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and RNA for monitoring the health of kidney allografts. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether urine filtration can serve as an alternative to the commonly used method of centrifugation to collect urinary fluid and cell pellets for isolating cfDNA and cellular messenger RNA (mRNA). We collected urine specimens from kidney allograft recipients and obtained the urine supernatant and cell pellet from each specimen using both filtration and centrifugation for paired analyses. We performed DNA sequencing to characterize the origin and properties of cfDNA, as well as quantitative PCR of mRNAs extracted from cell fractions. Our results showed that the biophysical properties of cfDNA, the microbial DNA content, and the tissues of origin of cfDNA were comparable between samples processed using filtration and centrifugation method. Similarly, mRNA quality and quantity obtained using both methods met our criteria for downstream application and the Ct values for each mRNA were comparable between the two techniques.The Ct values demonstrated a high degree of correlation. These findings suggest that urine filtration is a viable alternative to urine centrifugation for isolation of nucleic acid biomarkers from urine specimens.