Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of neuraxial anesthesia in sitting and lateral positions on maternal hemodynamics in cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wen, Cui; Xiang, Ying-Ying; Pang, Qian-Yun; Liu, Hong-Liang.
Affiliation
  • Wen C; Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Xiang YY; Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Pang QY; Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Liu HL; Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303256, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758837
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

During cesarean section, hypotension is a frequent side effect of spinal anesthesia. As a sitting or lateral position is required for spinal anesthesia performance, which of these two positions is more likely to cause intraoperative nausea, vomiting, and hypotension is still unknown. This meta-analysis compared the effects of these two positions on maternal hemodynamics and intraoperative nausea and vomiting.

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING:

Operating room. PATIENTS This study included 803 patients from 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

INTERVENTIONS:

Neuraxial anesthesia in sitting position vs. lateral position. MEASUREMENTS We chose RCTs comparing the effects of spinal anesthesia in the sitting and lateral positions on maternal hemodynamics by thoroughly searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science for articles published from database inception until October 31, 2022. The Cochrane Handbook was used to assess the methodological quality of each RCT; the results were analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software; and the Egger test was used to assess publication bias. MAIN

RESULTS:

12 randomised controlled trials with 803 participants were ultimately included in the final analysis. No significant differences were observed between the two positions in terms of the incidence of hypotension(RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58-1.16; P = 0.26; I2 = 66%), lowest systolic blood pressure(MD, -0.81; 95% CI, -7.38-5.75; P = 0.81; I2 = 86%), the dose of ephedrine(MD, -1.19; 95% CI, -4.91-2.52; P = 0.53; I2 = 83%), and number of parturients requiring ephedrine(RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64-1.46; P = 0.88; I2 = 74%). For the incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting, there was no statistical difference between the two positions.

CONCLUSION:

Parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in the sitting or lateral position experienced similar incidence of hypotension, and there were no significant differences between these two positions in terms of the amount of ephedrine administered or the number of patients needing ephedrine. In both positions, the frequency of nausea and vomiting was comparable. The ideal position for anesthesia can be chosen based on the preferences and individual circumstances of the parturient and anesthesiologist.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cesarean Section / Hemodynamics / Anesthesia, Spinal Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cesarean Section / Hemodynamics / Anesthesia, Spinal Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: United States