Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative assessment of bone density for dental implantation: a comparative study of three different ROI methods.
Wang, Shiuan-Hui; Fuh, Lih-Jyh; Chen, Michael Y C; Tsai, Ming-Tzu; Huang, Heng-Li; Peng, Shin-Lei; Hsu, Jui-Ting.
Affiliation
  • Wang SH; School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.
  • Fuh LJ; School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.
  • Chen MYC; Department of Dentistry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.
  • Tsai MT; School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.
  • Huang HL; Department of Dentistry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.
  • Peng SL; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hungkuang University, Taichung, 433, Taiwan.
  • Hsu JT; Department of Dentistry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 404, Taiwan.
Head Face Med ; 20(1): 33, 2024 May 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760840
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used to evaluate cancellous bone density before dental implant surgery. However, to our knowledge, no measurement approach has been standardized yet. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between three different regions of interest (ROI) methods on cancellous bone density at the dental implant site using dental CBCT images.

METHODS:

Patients' dental CBCT images (n = 300) obtained before dental implant surgery were processed using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). At the potential implant sites, the rectangle, cylinder, and surrounding cylinder ROI methods were used to measure bone density. Repeated measures one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the three ROI methods in terms of measurement results. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to identify the likely pair-wise correlations between the three ROI methods.

RESULTS:

The density value obtained using the surrounding cylinder approach (grayscale value [GV],523.56 ± 228.03) was significantly higher than the values obtained using the rectangle (GV, 497.04 ± 236.69) and cylinder (GV,493 ± 231.19) ROI methods in terms of results. Furthermore, significant correlations were noted between the ROI methods (r > 0.965; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The density measured using the surrounding cylinder method was the highest. The choice of method may not influence the trends of measurement results. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, No. CMUH111-REC3-205. Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, CMUH111-REC3-205, owing to the retrospective nature of the study.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Density / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Head Face Med Journal subject: MEDICINA / ODONTOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Density / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Head Face Med Journal subject: MEDICINA / ODONTOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan Country of publication: United kingdom