Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of CRSwNP in the real-life setting: a review of the literature.
Reale, Marella; Licci, Giuseppe; Orlando, Pietro; Matucci, Andrea; Trabalzini, Franco; Maggiore, Giandomenico; Gallo, Oreste.
Affiliation
  • Reale M; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla, 3 - 50134, Florence, Italy.
  • Licci G; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
  • Orlando P; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla, 3 - 50134, Florence, Italy.
  • Matucci A; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla, 3 - 50134, Florence, Italy. pietro.orlando@unifi.it.
  • Trabalzini F; Department of Immunology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
  • Maggiore G; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
  • Gallo O; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762844
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The recent approval of Dupilumab has profoundly revolutionized the management of patients affected by severe and recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). However, a review that summarizes the results of real-life studies and compares them to phase 3 studies SINUS-24 and 52 is still lacking. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A search of all real-life studies published from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Patients characteristics at baseline and 6 and 12 months after starting Dupilumab were extracted and compared to those from phase 3 trials age, sex, smoking habits, comorbid asthma and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), previous endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), hematic eosinophils and total IgE, NasalAQ2 Polyps Score (NPS), smell, SNOT-22, adverse events (AEs), and response to treatment.

RESULTS:

15 papers were included with an overall number of 1658 patients. A higher rate of comorbidities and previous ESS was found in patients from real-life studies. In addition, they had worse smell and SNOT-22 at baseline compared to patients from SINUS-24 and 52. Comorbid and post-ESS patients tended to have a faster NPS and SNOT-22 improvement, although the absolute values were not clinically relevant. A more extensive surgery and a number of ESS ≥ 2 were related to worse olfactory outcomes, probably due to iatrogenic damage. No correlation was found between hematic eosinophils and outcomes. AEs were reported by 12.4% of patients and 2.2% had to discontinue dupilumab. Weight gain was an emergent AE (0.8%), probably related to the restored sense of smell and taste. Non-responders were 3.5% and they were switched to systemic steroid, ESS, or another biologic.

CONCLUSION:

Despite some differences in prescription criteria between countries, dupilumab was demonstrated to be effective even in the real-life scenario. However, emerging AEs and possible unknown long-term AEs of a likely lifelong therapy should be considered.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italy