Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation proctitis after iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy utilizing SpaceOAR hydrogel.
Morita, Masashi; Hiramatsu, Aya; Nishimura, Kota; Yanagida, Wahei; Nakamura, Saori; Yamatoya, Jin; Noguchi, Tetsuo; Tanabe, Mayo; Fukagai, Takashi; Lederer, John L.
Affiliation
  • Morita M; Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hiramatsu A; Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nishimura K; Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yanagida W; Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nakamura S; Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yamatoya J; Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Noguchi T; Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Tanabe M; Digestive Diseases Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Fukagai T; Department of Urology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Lederer JL; Department of Surgery, JABSOM, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Int J Urol ; 2024 Jun 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822580
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of combining the SpaceOAR (SOAR) hydrogel with prostate brachytherapy, using colonoscopy findings to assess for radiation proctitis.

METHODS:

Among 731 patients undergoing iodine-125 low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), SOAR was utilized in 394 patients (53.9%). Colonoscopy was performed for 97 patients (13.3%) to assess the presence, location, condition, and treatment of radiation proctitis. We also investigated treatment factors associated with the occurrence of radiation proctitis.

RESULTS:

Radiation proctitis was observed in 57 patients (7.8%) and 17 (2.3%) were treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC). The incidence of radiation proctitis was 12.2% in the non-SOAR and 4.1% in the SOAR group (p < 0.001). In the non-SOAR group, the incidence of radiation proctitis was 6.6% for LDR-BT monotherapy and increased to 22.0% when combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (p = 0.001). However, in the SOAR group, these rates significantly decreased to 3.3% and 5.7% for monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively (p = 0.035, p < 0.001). With SOAR, inflammation was observed directly above the DL in most patients (87.5%), and only one patient (6.3%) required APC. The absence of SOAR (p < 0.001, HR = 0.29) and the concurrent use of EBRT (p = 0.018, HR = 2.87) were identified as significant risk factors for the occurrence of radiation proctitis.

CONCLUSION:

The use of SOAR significantly reduced the incidence of radiation proctitis in patients undergoing LDR-BT monotherapy and combined EBRT. Inflammation primarily occurred directly above the DL; further examination is necessary to clarify its cause.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japan
...