Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pain and other complications of pelvic mesh: a systematic review of qualitative studies and thematic synthesis of women's accounts.
Williams, Amanda C de C; Lodato, Mary; McGrigor, Honor.
Affiliation
  • Williams ACC; Psychology and Language Sciences, UCL, London, UK amanda.williams@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Lodato M; Independent Researcher, Kettering, UK.
  • McGrigor H; Psychology & Language Sciences, UCL, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e085879, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830733
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Synthesis of the experience of women with pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal, to identify pain-related problems and to formulate psychological aspects of pain.

DESIGN:

Systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies of pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh, or mesh removal, in women over 18 years, using individual interviews, focus groups, free text, or written or oral contributions to formal enquiries. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase and PsycINFO, from inception to 26 April 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Qualitative studies of pain and other symptoms from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal; adults; no language restriction. DATA EXTRACTION AND

SYNTHESIS:

Line-by-line coding of participant quotations and study author statements by one author to provide codes that were applied to half the studies by another author and differences resolved by discussion. Codes were grouped into subthemes and themes by both authors, then scrutinised and discussed by a focus group of mesh-injured women for omissions, emphasis and coherence. Studies were appraised using an amalgamation of the CASP and COREQ tools.

RESULTS:

2292 search results produced 9 eligible studies, with 7-752 participants, a total of around 2000. Four recruited patients, four totally or partially from mesh advocacy groups, and two were national enquiries (UK and Australia). Four major themes were as follows broken body, broken mind; distrust of doctors and the medical industry; broken life and keeping going-a changed future. Psychological content mainly concerned the loss of trust in medical care, leaving women unsupported in facing an uncertain future. Mesh-injured women strongly endorsed the findings.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pain and other problems associated with pelvic mesh are profound and far-reaching for women affected. Worse, they feel subject to continued gaslighting, including denial of their mesh-related problems and dismissal of their concerns about continued mesh insertion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022330527.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Mesh / Qualitative Research Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Mesh / Qualitative Research Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United kingdom