Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Process evaluation of a data-driven quality improvement program within a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve coronary heart disease management in Australian primary care.
Hafiz, Nashid; Hyun, Karice; Tu, Qiang; Knight, Andrew; Hespe, Charlotte; Chow, Clara K; Briffa, Tom; Gallagher, Robyn; Reid, Christopher M; Hare, David L; Zwar, Nicholas; Woodward, Mark; Jan, Stephen; Atkins, Emily R; Laba, Tracey-Lea; Halcomb, Elizabeth; Johnson, Tracey; Manandi, Deborah; Usherwood, Tim; Redfern, Julie.
Affiliation
  • Hafiz N; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
  • Hyun K; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
  • Tu Q; Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, ANZAC Research Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Knight A; School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
  • Hespe C; Primary and Integrated Care Unit, Southwestern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
  • Chow CK; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Briffa T; The University of Notre Dame, School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia.
  • Gallagher R; Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
  • Reid CM; Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Westmead, Australia.
  • Hare DL; School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Zwar N; Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Woodward M; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
  • Jan S; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Atkins ER; University of Melbourne and Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Laba TL; Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
  • Halcomb E; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Johnson T; The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
  • Manandi D; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Usherwood T; Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Westmead, Australia.
  • Redfern J; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0298777, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833486
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study evaluates primary care practices' engagement with various features of a quality improvement (QI) intervention for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in four Australian states.

METHODS:

Twenty-seven practices participated in the QI intervention from November 2019 -November 2020. A combination of surveys, semi-structured interviews and other materials within the QUality improvement in primary care to prevent hospitalisations and improve Effectiveness and efficiency of care for people Living with heart disease (QUEL) study were used in the process evaluation. Data were summarised using descriptive statistical and thematic analyses for 26 practices.

RESULTS:

Sixty-four practice team members and Primary Health Networks staff provided feedback, and nine of the 63 participants participated in the interviews. Seventy-eight percent (40/54) were either general practitioners or practice managers. Although 69% of the practices self-reported improvement in their management of heart disease, engagement with the intervention varied. Forty-two percent (11/26) of the practices attended five or more learning workshops, 69% (18/26) used Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, and the median (Interquartile intervals) visits per practice to the online SharePoint site were 170 (146-252) visits. Qualitative data identified learning workshops and monthly feedback reports as the key features of the intervention.

CONCLUSION:

Practice engagement in a multi-featured data-driven QI intervention was common, with learning workshops and monthly feedback reports identified as the most useful features. A better understanding of these features will help influence future implementation of similar interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) number ACTRN12619001790134.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / Coronary Disease / Quality Improvement Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Health Care / Coronary Disease / Quality Improvement Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia