Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shape variation in cranium, mandible and teeth in selected mouse strains.
Agaç, Duygu Küçük; Oktay, Ece; Onuk, Burcu; Kabak, Murat; Gündemir, Ozan.
Affiliation
  • Agaç DK; Department of Veterinary, Siran Mustafa Beyaz Vocational School, Gümüshane University, Gumushane, Turkey.
  • Oktay E; Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Onuk B; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
  • Kabak M; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
  • Gündemir O; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anat Histol Embryol ; 53(4): e13064, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841825
ABSTRACT
There are different strains of laboratory mouse used in many different fields. These strains differ anatomically. In order to determine these anatomical differences, shape analysis was conducted according to species. CD-1, C57bl/6 and Balb-c strains were preferred to study these differences. Forty-eight adult mouse strains belonging to these strains were utilized. The bones were photographed and geometric morphometry was applied to these photographs. Principal Component Analysis was applied to determine shape variations. In Principal component 1 for cranium, CD-1 and C57bl/6 strain groups showed different shape variations, while Balb-c strain group showed similar shape variations to the other strain groups. Principal Component 1 for the mandible separated the CD-1 and C57bl/6 strain groups in terms of shape variation. Principal Component 2 explained most of the variation between the C57bl/6 and CD-1 lineage groups. In PC1 for molars, the CD-1 group showed a different shape variation from the other groups. Mahalanobis distances and Procrustes distances were measured using Canonical variance analysis to explain the differences between the lineage groups. These measurements were statistically significant. For cranium, in canonical variate 1, CD-1 group of mouse and Balb-c group of mouse were separated from each other. In canonical variate 2, C57bl/6 group of mouse were separated from the other groups. For mandible, Balb-c group of mouse in canonical variate 1 and CD-1 group of mouse in canonical variate 2 were separated from the other groups. For molars, CD-1 group of mouse in canonical variate 1 and Balb-c group of mouse in canonical variate 2 were separated from the other groups. It was thought that these anatomical differences could be caused by genotypic factors as well as dietary differences and many different habits that would affect the way their muscles work.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skull / Mandible / Mice, Inbred BALB C / Mice, Inbred C57BL Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Anat Histol Embryol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Country of publication: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skull / Mandible / Mice, Inbred BALB C / Mice, Inbred C57BL Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Anat Histol Embryol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey Country of publication: Germany