Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of crossbreeding on growth performance, meat quality, and the economics of production of the pure and reciprocal crosses between the Sasso and Wassachie chickens.
Dzungwe, Joshua T; Adjei-Mensah, Benjamin; Chrysostome, Christophe A A M; Tozo, Koffi.
Affiliation
  • Dzungwe JT; Regional Center of Excellence for Poultry Science (CERSA), University of Lome, Lome, Togo; Department of Animal Breeding and Physiology, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria. Electronic address: torsagain@gmail.com.
  • Adjei-Mensah B; Regional Center of Excellence for Poultry Science (CERSA), University of Lome, Lome, Togo.
  • Chrysostome CAAM; Department of Animal Production, University of Abomey-Cavali, Benin, Africa.
  • Tozo K; Regional Center of Excellence for Poultry Science (CERSA), University of Lome, Lome, Togo.
Poult Sci ; 103(8): 103823, 2024 May 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848633
ABSTRACT
The interplay between genetics and economics is important in understanding how crossbreeding can be harnessed to optimize sustainable poultry production, meat quality, and economic viability. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of crossbreeding on growth performance, meat quality, and production economics. A total of 451 unsexed day-old chicks were raised for 12 wk in a pure (Sasso X Sasso [SS]; Wassachie X Wassachie [WW]) and reciprocal cross (Sasso X Wassachie [SW]; Wassachie X Sasso [WS]) design. Data was collected on growth performance, meat quality, sensory evaluation, proximate analysis, and production economics. Genotype did not affect (P > 0.05) moisture, dry matter, ash, sensory evaluation, pH, and meat temperature. The carcass weights, final body weight, and cumulative weight gain of the hybrids were intermediate while the SS recorded the highest (P < 0.05) values. Drip loss between the WW and the reciprocal crosses was similar (P > 0.05) but lower (P < 0.05) than the SS genotype. Protein contents between the purebreds were similar likewise the crossbreds (P > 0.05). The SW cross recorded a higher (P < 0.05) lipid content compared to the WW cross while the WS recorded a higher (P < 0.05) protein content compared to the SS. The SS incurred higher feeding costs, and gross and net returns followed by the SW and then the WS with the WW having the lowest values. Crossbreeding improved growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, chemical composition, and the gains in the crossbreds with the SW genotype having better results. The SW cross is recommended for better performance.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Poult Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Poult Sci Year: 2024 Document type: Article