Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Self-controlled risk interval study of rotavirus vaccine safety: Findings and implications.
Puliyel, Jacob; Hooker, Brian S.
Affiliation
  • Puliyel J; International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India.
  • Hooker BS; Simpson University, Redding, CA, USA.
Int J Risk Saf Med ; 35(3): 207-215, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875047
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The self-controlled case series (SCCS) is often used to monitor vaccine safety. The evaluation of intussusception after the rotavirus vaccine is complicated because the baseline rate varies with age. Time-varying baseline risk adjustments with data from unexposed cohorts are utilised. Self-controlled risk interval (SCRI), with a shorter observation period, can also mitigate the problem by studying a control period close to the risk period.

OBJECTIVE:

An Indian rotavirus vaccine has previously been studied using SCCS. The risk of intussusception in the high-risk windows (21 days after vaccination) was comparable to the background risk. The aim was to re-analyse data of an existing SCCS study using alternate statistical methods to examine vaccine safety.

METHODS:

We examined the mean age of intussusception in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. We performed an SCRI analysis of the surveillance data from the SCCS study, limiting the observation period to 180 days. We analysed the time-to-intussusception from the last vaccination. Finally, we performed an SCCS analysis, excluding unvaccinated cases from the analysis.

RESULTS:

We found that the mean age of intussusception was significantly lower in the vaccinated (205 days) compared to the unvaccinated (223 days) (p-value 0.0026). The Incident Risk Ratio (IRR) on SCRI analysis was 1.62 (95% CI 1.07-2.44). There were significantly more intussusceptions in the first 30 days after vaccination compared to the next 30-day window. (92 vs 63 p-value = 0.009). We found that excluding unvaccinated infants from the SCCS analysis demonstrated significantly increased risk for the risk period 1-21 days after the 3rd dose (IRR 2.47, 95% CI 1.70-3.59). The risks of intussusception were missed in traditional SCCS analysis using unvaccinated infants as controls.

CONCLUSION:

Traditional risk adjustments using data from unexposed cohorts in SCCS may not be appropriate for investigating the risk of intussusception where vaccination lowers the mean age of intussusception.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rotavirus Vaccines / Intussusception Limits: Humans / Infant Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Int J Risk Saf Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rotavirus Vaccines / Intussusception Limits: Humans / Infant Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Int J Risk Saf Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India Country of publication: Netherlands