Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breaking down processing speed: Motor and cognitive insights in first-episode psychosis and unaffected first-degree relatives.
Yorca-Ruiz, Ángel; Magdaleno Herrero, Rebeca; Ortiz García de la Foz, Víctor; Murillo-García, Nancy; Ayesa-Arriola, Rosa.
Affiliation
  • Yorca-Ruiz Á; Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, Santander, Spain.
  • Magdaleno Herrero R; Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, Santander, Spain.
  • Ortiz García de la Foz V; Department of Psychiatry, Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, Santander, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center for Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
  • Murillo-García N; Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, Santander, Spain.
  • Ayesa-Arriola R; Department of Psychiatry, Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, Santander, Spain; Faculty of Psychology, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Center for Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: rayesa@humv.es.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908403
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Processing speed (PS) deficits represent a fundamental aspect of cognitive impairment, evident not only in schizophrenia but also in individuals undergoing their first episode of psychosis (FEP) and their unaffected first-degree relatives. Heterogeneity in tests assessing PS reflects the participation of motor and cognitive subcomponents to varying degrees. We aim to explore differences in performance of the subcomponents of PS in FEP patients, parents, siblings, and controls. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Results from tests, including Trail Making Test part A and part B, Digit Symbol Coding Test, Grooved Pegboard Test, and Stroop Word and Stroop Color subtests, were obtained from 133 FEP patients, 146 parents, and 202 controls. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed in controls to establish the structure, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify if the other groups share this structure.

RESULTS:

EFA revealed a two-factor model Factor 1 for the motor subcomponent and Factor 2 for the cognitive subcomponent. Subsequently, CFA indicated a good fit for the remaining groups with differences in the relationship between the factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Differences in the relationships of factors within a common structure suggest the involvement of different compensatory strategies among groups, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of PS deficits in patients and relatives.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Span J Psychiatry Ment Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain Country of publication: Spain

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Span J Psychiatry Ment Health Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Spain Country of publication: Spain