Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners using sit-stand desks: a feasibility trial.
Biddle, Gregory James Hamilton; Thomas, Nicholas; Edwardson, Charlotte L; Clemes, Stacy A; Daley, Amanda J.
Affiliation
  • Biddle GJH; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Loughborough, UK gjhb2@leicester.ac.uk.
  • Thomas N; School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
  • Edwardson CL; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and the University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Clemes SA; Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.
  • Daley AJ; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Loughborough, UK.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e084085, 2024 Jun 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910005
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of general practitioners (GPs) using sit-stand desks to facilitate standing during consultations. A further aim was to examine the views of patients about GPs standing for their consultations.

DESIGN:

A pre-post single-group experimental trial design.

SETTING:

General practices in England, UK.

PARTICIPANTS:

42 GPs (working a minimum of five clinical sessions per week) and 301 patients (aged ≥18 years).

INTERVENTIONS:

The intervention consisted of each GP having a sit-stand desk (Opløft Sit-Stand Platform) installed in their consultation room for 4 working weeks. Sit-stand desks allow users to switch, in a few seconds, between a sitting and standing position and vice versa, by adjusting the height of the desk. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

To test feasibility and acceptability, GPs reported their views about using sit-stand desks at work at baseline and follow-up. Sitting time and physical activity were also measured via accelerometer at baseline and follow-up. Patients who attended a consultation where their GP was standing were asked to complete an exit questionnaire about the perceived impact on the consultation.

RESULTS:

Most GPs reported using their sit-stand desk daily (n=28, 75.7%). 16 GPs (44.4%) used their sit-stand desk during face-to-face consultations every day. Most GPs and patients did not view that GPs standing during face-to-face consultations impacted the doctor-patient relationship (GPs; 73.5%, patients; 83.7%). GPs' sitting time during work was 121 min per day lower (95% CI -165 to -77.58) at follow-up compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of sit-stand desks is acceptable within general practice and may reduce sitting time in GPs. This may benefit GPs and help reduce sitting time in patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN76982860.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Feasibility Studies / General Practitioners / Sitting Position / Standing Position Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Feasibility Studies / General Practitioners / Sitting Position / Standing Position Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom Country of publication: United kingdom