Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery on Antidiabetic Reimbursement: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Thereaux, Jérémie; Bennani, Mohammed; Khemis, Jean; Ohayon, Elisabeth; Visnovec Buissez, Isabelle; Lafourcade, Alexandre; Quiriconi, Laëtitia; Philippe, Caroline; Oppert, Jean-Michel.
Affiliation
  • Thereaux J; From the Department of General, Digestive and Metabolic Surgery (J.T.), La Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Boulevard Tanguy Prigent, Brest, France.
  • Bennani M; University of Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, Western Brittany Thrombosis Group, Brest, France.
  • Khemis J; Qualees, Paris, France.
  • Ohayon E; FNAMN, Cenon, France.
  • Visnovec Buissez I; FNAMN, Cenon, France.
  • Lafourcade A; FNAMN, Cenon, France.
  • Quiriconi L; Department of Nutrition, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
  • Philippe C; Qualees, Paris, France.
  • Oppert JM; Qualees, Paris, France.
Ann Surg Open ; 5(2): e420, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38911633
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study compared the effectiveness of 4 main revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) sequences after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB), on the reimbursement of antidiabetic treatments in France.

Background:

Few large-scale prospective cohort studies have assessed the changes in antidiabetic treatments after RBS.

Method:

This nationwide observational population-based cohort study analyzed data from the French National Health Insurance Database. All patients who underwent primary SG and AGB in France between January 2012 and December 2014 were included and followed up until December 31, 2020. The changes in categories and costs of reimbursed antidiabetic treatments across different RBS sequences were assessed (presented as follows bariatric surgery (BS)-RBS).

Results:

Among the 107,088 patients who underwent BS, 6396 underwent RBS, 2400 SG-GBP (SG converted to gastric bypass [GBP] during follow-up), 2277 AGB-SG, 1173 AGB-GBP, and 546 SG-SG. Pre-RBS insulin was used in 10 (2.9%), 4 (0.9%), 8 (2.4%), and 10 (2.6%) patients, respectively. Two years after RBS, the treatment discontinuation or decrease (the change of treatment to a lighter one category rates [eg, insulin to bi/tritherapy]) was 47%, 47%, 49%, and 34%, respectively. Four years after RBS, the median annual cost per patient compared with baseline was lower (P < 0.01) for all sequences, except SG-SG (P = 0.24). The most notable effect concerned AGB-GBP (median of more than 220 euros to 0).

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated the positive impact of RBS over a 4-year follow-up period on antidiabetic treatments reimbursement, through the reduction or discontinuation of treatments and a significant decrease in costs per patient.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Open Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France