Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An automated in vitro wound healing microscopy image analysis approach utilizing U-net-based deep learning methodology.
Dogru, Dilan; Özdemir, Gizem D; Özdemir, Mehmet A; Ercan, Utku K; Topaloglu Avsar, Nermin; Güren, Onan.
Affiliation
  • Dogru D; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Özdemir GD; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Özdemir MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Ercan UK; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey. makif.ozdemir@ikcu.edu.tr.
  • Topaloglu Avsar N; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey. makif.ozdemir@ikcu.edu.tr.
  • Güren O; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
BMC Med Imaging ; 24(1): 158, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914942
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The assessment of in vitro wound healing images is critical for determining the efficacy of the therapy-of-interest that may influence the wound healing process. Existing methods suffer significant limitations, such as user dependency, time-consuming nature, and lack of sensitivity, thus paving the way for automated analysis approaches.

METHODS:

Hereby, three structurally different variations of U-net architectures based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) were implemented for the segmentation of in vitro wound healing microscopy images. The developed models were fed using two independent datasets after applying a novel augmentation method aimed at the more sensitive analysis of edges after the preprocessing. Then, predicted masks were utilized for the accurate calculation of wound areas. Eventually, the therapy efficacy-indicator wound areas were thoroughly compared with current well-known tools such as ImageJ and TScratch.

RESULTS:

The average dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores were obtained as 0.958 ∼ 0.968 for U-net-based deep learning models. The averaged absolute percentage errors (PE) of predicted wound areas to ground truth were 6.41%, 3.70%, and 3.73%, respectively for U-net, U-net++, and Attention U-net, while ImageJ and TScratch had considerable averaged error rates of 22.59% and 33.88%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Comparative analyses revealed that the developed models outperformed the conventional approaches in terms of analysis time and segmentation sensitivity. The developed models also hold great promise for the prediction of the in vitro wound area, regardless of the therapy-of-interest, cell line, magnification of the microscope, or other application-dependent parameters.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Deep Learning / Microscopy Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Wound Healing / Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Deep Learning / Microscopy Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Med Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Turkey