Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating Machine Learning-Based MRI Reconstruction Using Digital Image Quality Phantoms.
Tan, Fei; Delfino, Jana G; Zeng, Rongping.
Affiliation
  • Tan F; Division of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability (DIDSR), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA), Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
  • Delfino JG; Division of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability (DIDSR), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA), Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
  • Zeng R; Division of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability (DIDSR), Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA), Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 11(6)2024 Jun 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38927849
ABSTRACT
Quantitative and objective evaluation tools are essential for assessing the performance of machine learning (ML)-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction methods. However, the commonly used fidelity metrics, such as mean squared error (MSE), structural similarity (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), often fail to capture fundamental and clinically relevant MR image quality aspects. To address this, we propose evaluation of ML-based MRI reconstruction using digital image quality phantoms and automated evaluation methods. Our phantoms are based upon the American College of Radiology (ACR) large physical phantom but created in k-space to simulate their MR images, and they can vary in object size, signal-to-noise ratio, resolution, and image contrast. Our evaluation pipeline incorporates evaluation metrics of geometric accuracy, intensity uniformity, percentage ghosting, sharpness, signal-to-noise ratio, resolution, and low-contrast detectability. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed pipeline by assessing an example ML-based reconstruction model across various training and testing scenarios. The performance results indicate that training data acquired with a lower undersampling factor and coils of larger anatomical coverage yield a better performing model. The comprehensive and standardized pipeline introduced in this study can help to facilitate a better understanding of the performance and guide future development and advancement of ML-based reconstruction algorithms.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Switzerland