Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of Time-Lag Effects between Winter-Wheat Canopy Temperature and Atmospheric Temperature on the Accuracy of CWSI Inversion of Photosynthetic Parameters.
Wang, Yujin; Lu, Yule; Yang, Ning; Wang, Jiankun; Huang, Zugui; Chen, Junying; Zhang, Zhitao.
Affiliation
  • Wang Y; College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China.
  • Lu Y; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China.
  • Yang N; College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China.
  • Wang J; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China.
  • Huang Z; College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China.
  • Chen J; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China.
  • Zhang Z; College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China.
Plants (Basel) ; 13(12)2024 Jun 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38931132
ABSTRACT
When calculating the CWSI, previous researchers usually used canopy temperature and atmospheric temperature at the same time. However, it takes some time for the canopy temperature (Tc) to respond to atmospheric temperature (Ta), suggesting the time-lag effects between Ta and Tc. In order to investigate time-lag effects between Ta and Tc on the accuracy of the CWSI inversion of photosynthetic parameters in winter wheat, we conducted an experiment. In this study, four moisture treatments were set up T1 (95% of field water holding capacity), T2 (80% of field water holding capacity), T3 (65% of field water holding capacity), and T4 (50% of field water holding capacity). We quantified the time-lag parameter in winter wheat using time-lag peak-seeking, time-lag cross-correlation, time-lag mutual information, and gray time-lag correlation analysis. Based on the time-lag parameter, we modified the CWSI theoretical and empirical models and assessed the impact of time-lag effects on the accuracy of the CWSI inversion of photosynthesis parameters. Finally, we applied several machine learning algorithms to predict the daily variation in the CWSI after time-lag correction. The results show that (1) The time-lag parameter calculated using time-lag peak-seeking, time-lag cross-correlation, time-lag mutual information, and gray time-lag correlation analysis are 44-70, 32-44, 42-58, and 76-97 min, respectively. (2) The CWSI empirical model corrected by the time-lag mutual information method has the highest correlation with photosynthetic parameters. (3) GA-SVM has the highest prediction accuracy for the CWSI empirical model corrected by the time-lag mutual information method. Considering time lag effects between Ta and Tc effectively enhanced the correlation between CWSI and photosynthetic parameters, which can provide theoretical support for thermal infrared remote sensing to diagnose crop water stress conditions.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Plants (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Plants (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China
...