Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of emergency department boarding on patients outcomes in hip fractures.
Crawford, Adam; Samanta, Damayanti; Smith, Collin; Area, Scott; Duvall, Nancy M.
Affiliation
  • Crawford A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, United States of America. Electronic address: adam.crawford@vandaliahealth.org.
  • Samanta D; Institute of Academic Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, United States of America. Electronic address: damayanti.samanta@vandaliahealth.org.
  • Smith C; Department of Emergency Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, United States of America. Electronic address: collin.smith@vandaliahealth.org.
  • Area S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, United States of America. Electronic address: scott.area@vandaliahealth.org.
  • Duvall NM; Institute of Academic Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV, United States of America. Electronic address: nancy.duvall@vandaliahealth.org.
Am J Emerg Med ; 83: 16-19, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943707
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Boarding time in the Emergency Department (ED) is an area of concern for all patients and potentially more problematic for the hip fracture population. Identifying patient outcomes impacted by ED boarding and improving emergent care to reduce surgical delay for this patient population is a recognized opportunity. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of ED boarding in relation to patient outcomes in the surgical hip fracture population.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study of hip fracture patients who presented at the ED of a Level 1 trauma center between January 2020 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into four quartiles based on boarding time. Study outcomes-hospital length of stay, time to surgery, visit to ICU post-operative, total blood products, in-hospital complications, discharge disposition, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission-were compared among these four quartiles.

RESULTS:

The outcome endpoints were comparable among the four quartiles except for time to surgery. Time to surgery significantly differed among the quartiles, increasing from 20.39 to 29.03 h (p < 0.001) from the first to fourth quartile.

CONCLUSION:

In contrast to the existing literature, ED boarding in our study was not associated with adverse outcomes except for time to surgery. By expediting the time to surgery in accordance with established guidelines, adverse outcomes were mitigated even when our patients boarded for a longer duration. System processes including a 24/7 trauma nurse practitioner model, availability of in-house orthopedic surgeons, and timely cardiac evaluation need to be considered in relation to time to surgery, in turn impacting ED boarding and patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Emergency Service, Hospital / Hip Fractures / Length of Stay Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med / Am. j. emerg. med / American journal of emergency medicine Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Emergency Service, Hospital / Hip Fractures / Length of Stay Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Emerg Med / Am. j. emerg. med / American journal of emergency medicine Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States