Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Adjacent Segment Disease versus Lumbar Disc Herniation in Elderly Patients.
Yuan, Shuo; Lu, Xuanyu; Zang, Lei; Mei, Yuqi; Fan, Ning; Du, Peng.
Affiliation
  • Yuan S; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People's Republic of China.
  • Lu X; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People's Republic of China.
  • Zang L; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People's Republic of China.
  • Mei Y; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People's Republic of China.
  • Fan N; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People's Republic of China.
  • Du P; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res ; 17: 2257-2265, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947133
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) was used as a minimally invasive treatment option for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, studies focusing on the clinical outcomes of PTED for elderly patients with adjacent segment disease (ASD) were limited. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of PTED between ASD and LDH in elderly patients. Patients and

Methods:

This retrospective study enrolled 39 patients with ASD and 39 patients with LDH. Both groups had undergone PTED in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from July 4, 2016 to July 30, 2021. Visual analog scale for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to value the clinical outcomes of patients preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Patients' satisfaction was evaluated based on the MacNab criteria.

Results:

All operations were completed. The excellent or good clinical outcomes at final follow-up was demonstrated by 87.15% (34/39) and 89.74% (35/39) in ASD and non-ASD patients, respectively. Clinical improvement was observed immediately postoperatively in both groups and sustained stability during the postoperative follow-up. The ASD group demonstrated significantly longer hospital stays (p = 0.02) and operative time (p < 0.01) than the non-ASD group.

Conclusion:

PTED is an effective and minimally invasive treatment option for revision surgery of ASD, especially for elderly patients. However, the long-term prognosis of PTED treating ASD still needs further exploration.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Pain Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Pain Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article