Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges in collecting information on sexual orientation and gender identity for cancer patients: perspectives of hospital and central cancer registry abstractors.
Sorensen, J L; West, M M; Racila, A M; Amao, O A; Matt, B J; Bentler, S; Kahl, A R; Charlton, M E; Seaman, A T; Nash, S H.
Affiliation
  • Sorensen JL; Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • West MM; State Health Registry of Iowa, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Racila AM; Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Amao OA; Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Matt BJ; Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Bentler S; State Health Registry of Iowa, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Kahl AR; State Health Registry of Iowa, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Charlton ME; State Health Registry of Iowa, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Seaman AT; Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Nash SH; State Health Registry of Iowa, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38954307
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations experience cancer treatment and survival disparities; however, inconsistent sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection within clinical settings and the cancer surveillance system precludes population-based research toward health equity for this population. This qualitative study examined how hospital and central registry abstractors receive and interact with SOGI information and the challenges that they face in doing so.

METHODS:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 abstractors at five Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries, as well as seven abstractors from commission on cancer (CoC)-accredited hospital programs in Iowa. Interviews were transcribed, cleaned, and coded using a combination of a priori and emergent codes. These codes were then used to conduct a descriptive analysis and to identify domains across the interviews.

RESULTS:

Interviews revealed that abstractors had difficulty locating SOGI information in the medical record this information was largely never recorded, and when included, was inconsistently/not uniformly located in the medical record. On occasion, abstractors reported situational recording of SOGI information when relevant to the patient's cancer diagnosis. Abstractors further noticed that, where reported, the source of SOGI information (i.e., patient, physician) is largely unknown.

CONCLUSION:

Efforts are needed to ensure standardized implementation of the collection of SOGI variables within the clinical setting, such that this information can be collected by the central cancer registry system to support population-based equity research addressing LGBTQ + disparities.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cancer Causes Control Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cancer Causes Control Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States