Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anesthetic Choice for Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage: A National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry Analysis.
Hickman, William; Dada, Rachel S; Thibault, Dylan; Gibson, Christina; Heller, Scott; Jagadeesan, Vikrant; Hayanga, Heather K.
Affiliation
  • Hickman W; School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  • Dada RS; Department of Anesthesiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  • Thibault D; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  • Gibson C; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, West Virginia University, United States.
  • Heller S; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  • Jagadeesan V; Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States.
  • Hayanga HK; Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, West Virginia University, United States.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 27(3): 220-227, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963356
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was developed as a novel stroke prevention alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly for those not suitable for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. Traditionally, general anesthesia (GA) has been more commonly used primarily due to the necessity of transesophageal echocardiography.

AIMS:

Compare trends of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus GA for percutaneous transcatheter LAAC with endocardial implant and assess for independent variables associated with primary anesthetic choice. SETTINGS AND

DESIGN:

Multi-institutional data collected from across the United States using the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Retrospective data analysis from 2017-2021. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED Independent-sample t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS:

A total of 19,395 patients underwent the procedure, and 352 patients (1.8%) received MAC. MAC usage trended upward from 2017-2021 (P < 0.0001). MAC patients were more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of≥ 4 (33.6% vs 22.89%) and to have been treated at centers in the South (67.7% vs 44.2%), in rural locations (71% vs 39.5%), and with lower median annual percutaneous transcatheter LAAC volume (102 vs 153 procedures) (all P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, patients treated in the West had 85% lower odds of receiving MAC compared to those in the Northeast (AOR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.80, P = 0.0261).

CONCLUSIONS:

While GA is the most common anesthetic technique for percutaneous transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage, a small, statistically significant increase in MAC occurred from 2017-2021. Anesthetic management for LAAC varies with geographic location.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atrial Fibrillation / Cardiac Catheterization / Registries / Atrial Appendage / Anesthesia, General Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Ann Card Anaesth Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atrial Fibrillation / Cardiac Catheterization / Registries / Atrial Appendage / Anesthesia, General Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Ann Card Anaesth Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: India