Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Early and Late Norepinephrine Administration in Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ahn, Chiwon; Yu, Gina; Shin, Tae Gun; Cho, Youngsuk; Park, Sunghoon; Suh, Gee Young.
Affiliation
  • Ahn C; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Yu G; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Yonsei College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Shin TG; Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: drshin88@gmail.com.
  • Cho Y; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Park S; Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, South Korea.
  • Suh GY; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chest ; 2024 Jul 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972348
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Vasopressor administration at an appropriate time is crucial, but the optimal timing remains controversial. RESEARCH QUESTION Does early vs late norepinephrine administration impact the prognosis of septic shock? STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KMbase databases. We included studies of adults with sepsis and categorized patients into an early and late norepinephrine group according to specific time points or differences in norepinephrine use protocols. The primary outcome was overall mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in the ICU, days free from ventilator use, days free from renal replacement therapy, days free from vasopressor use, adverse events, and total fluid volume.

RESULTS:

Twelve studies (four randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and eight observational studies) comprising 7,281 patients were analyzed. For overall mortality, no significant difference was found between the early norepinephrine group and late norepinephrine group in RCTs (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41-1.19) or observational studies (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.54-1.29). In the two RCTs without a restrictive fluid strategy that prioritized vasopressors and lower IV fluid volumes, the early norepinephrine group showed significantly lower mortality than the late norepinephrine group (OR, 0.49; 95%, CI, 0.25-0.96). The early norepinephrine group demonstrated more mechanical ventilator-free days in observational studies (mean difference, 4.06; 95% CI, 2.82-5.30). The incidence of pulmonary edema was lower in the early norepinephrine group in the three RCTs that reported this outcome (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.74). No differences were found in the other secondary outcomes.

INTERPRETATION:

Overall mortality did not differ significantly between early and late norepinephrine administration for septic shock. However, early norepinephrine administration seemed to reduce pulmonary edema incidence, and mortality improvement was observed in studies without fluid restriction interventions, favoring early norepinephrine use.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: South Korea Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Chest Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: South Korea Country of publication: United States