Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Visual Intratumor Heterogeneity and Breast Tumor Progression.
Li, Yao; Van Alsten, Sarah C; Lee, Dong Neuck; Kim, Taebin; Calhoun, Benjamin C; Perou, Charles M; Wobker, Sara E; Marron, J S; Hoadley, Katherine A; Troester, Melissa A.
Affiliation
  • Li Y; Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Van Alsten SC; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Lee DN; Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Kim T; Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Calhoun BC; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Perou CM; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Wobker SE; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Marron JS; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Hoadley KA; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Troester MA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(13)2024 Jun 21.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39001357
ABSTRACT
High intratumoral heterogeneity is thought to be a poor prognostic indicator. However, the source of heterogeneity may also be important, as genomic heterogeneity is not always reflected in histologic or 'visual' heterogeneity. We aimed to develop a predictor of histologic heterogeneity and evaluate its association with outcomes and molecular heterogeneity. We used VGG16 to train an image classifier to identify unique, patient-specific visual features in 1655 breast tumors (5907 core images) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS). Extracted features for images, as well as the epithelial and stromal image components, were hierarchically clustered, and visual heterogeneity was defined as a greater distance between images from the same patient. We assessed the association between visual heterogeneity, clinical features, and DNA-based molecular heterogeneity using generalized linear models, and we used Cox models to estimate the association between visual heterogeneity and tumor recurrence. Basal-like and ER-negative tumors were more likely to have low visual heterogeneity, as were the tumors from younger and Black women. Less heterogeneous tumors had a higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval = 1.22-2.16), and were more likely to come from patients whose tumors were comprised of only one subclone or had a TP53 mutation. Associations were similar regardless of whether the image was based on stroma, epithelium, or both. Histologic heterogeneity adds complementary information to commonly used molecular indicators, with low heterogeneity predicting worse outcomes. Future work integrating multiple sources of heterogeneity may provide a more comprehensive understanding of tumor progression.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
...