Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparative American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) Performance Analysis Between International vs. Domestic Graduates and Doctor of Medicine (MD) vs. Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) Medical Degrees.
Rahimpour, Armein; Morrison, Missy; Denning, David A; Bown, Paul; Ray, Peter; Barry, Rahman.
Affiliation
  • Rahimpour A; General Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
  • Morrison M; General Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
  • Denning DA; General Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
  • Bown P; General Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
  • Ray P; Plastic Surgery, UK King's Daughters Medical Center, Ashland, USA.
  • Barry R; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Cureus ; 16(6): e62358, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39006591
ABSTRACT
Introduction The American Board of Surgery (ABS) plays a pivotal role in certifying surgeons in the United States, with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) serving as a critical assessment tool for general surgery residents aspiring for certification. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of international medical graduates (IMGs) to their domestic counterparts and assess the impact of different medical degrees on ABSITE scores. Notably, ABSITE scores often dictate the trajectory of a surgical career, including opportunities for fellowship placements in specialized fields such as plastic surgery. Methods This study focused on general surgery residents enrolled at Marshall University from 2014 to 2022. Data encompassing ABSITE scores, TrueLearn quiz percentages, and TrueLearn mock exam results were collected for analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized sample characteristics, and linear mixed models were employed to address correlations. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), with significance defined by a two-sided test with p < 0.05. Results Among the 48 participants, comprising 24 non-international medical graduates (nIMGs) and 24 IMGs, IMGs demonstrated superior performance across various metrics. They exhibited higher quiz percentages (67% vs. 61%; p = 0.0029), mock Exam 1 scores (64% vs. 58%; p = 0.0021), mock Exam 2 scores (66% vs. 58%; p = 0.0015), ABSITE scores (560 vs. 505; p = 0.010), and ABSITE percentages (74% vs. 68%; p = 0.0077) compared to nIMGs. Analysis between Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) and Doctor of Medicine (MD) participants revealed no statistically significant differences in performance metrics, highlighting the comparability of these medical degrees in the context of ABSITE scores and related assessments. Discussion/conclusion This study underscores the superior performance of IMGs over nIMGs in ABSITE examinations, shedding light on the critical role of ABSITE scores in shaping surgical careers. Higher scores correlate with enhanced opportunities for coveted fellowship placements, particularly in specialized fields like plastic surgery. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for resident training and navigating the competitive landscape of surgical sub-specialization. Future research endeavors can delve deeper into the factors influencing ABSITE performance, thereby facilitating the development of targeted interventions to support residents in achieving their career aspirations.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Cureus Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States