Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A novel risk classification model integrating CEA, ctDNA, and pTN stage for stage 3 colon cancer: a post hoc analysis of the IDEA-France trial.
Samaille, Thomas; Falcoz, Antoine; Cohen, Romain; Laurent-Puig, Pierre; André, Thierry; Taieb, Julien; Auclin, Edouard; Vernerey, Dewi.
Affiliation
  • Samaille T; Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Falcoz A; Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Cohen R; Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Laurent-Puig P; Institut du cancer Paris CARPEM, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • André T; Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Taieb J; Department of Gastroenterology and GI oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, SIRIC CARPE, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
  • Auclin E; Department of Medical Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Vernerey D; Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Oncologist ; 2024 Jul 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011625
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We assessed the added value of incorporating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and pathological TN (pTN) stage for risk classification in stage 3 colon cancer (CC). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed postoperative CEA values in patients with CC from the IDEA-France phase 3 trial. The relation between disease-free survival (DFS) and CEA was modeled through restricted cubic splines. Prognostic value of CEA, ctDNA, and pTN was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic and predictive factors for DFS.

RESULTS:

Among 696 patients (35%), CEA values were retrievable, and for 405 (20%) both CEA and ctDNA were available. An optimized CEA threshold of 2 ng/mL was identified, the 3-year DFS was 66.4% for patients above the threshold and 80.9% for those below (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.33-2.28, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, CEA ≥ 2 ng/mL contributed significantly to model variability, becoming an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR, 1.82; 95% CI,1.27-2.59), alongside ctDNA (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.16-3.03) and pTN (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.24-2.54). A novel integrated risk classification combining CEA, ctDNA, and pTN stage reclassified 19.8% of pT4/N2 patients as low risk and 2.5% of pT3/N1 patients as high risk. This new classification demonstrated the 3-year DFS of 80.8% for low-risk patients and 55.4% for high-risk patients (HR, 2.66, 95% CI, 1.84-3.86, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Postoperative CEA value is a prognostic factor for DFS in stage 3 CC, independently of ctDNA and pTN. It advocates for systematic reporting in future adjuvant trials. Integrating both biomarkers with pTN could refine risk classification in stage 3 CC.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Oncologist Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Oncologist Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: France
...