Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Discrepancies in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study.
Schols, Laurens A; Maranus, Myrthe E; Rood, Pleunie P M; Zwaan, Laura.
Affiliation
  • Schols LA; From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Maranus ME; From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Rood PPM; From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Zwaan L; Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam (iMERR), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Patient Saf ; 20(6): 420-425, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39016467
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Diagnostic errors contribute substantially to preventable medical errors. Especially, the emergency department (ED) is a high-risk environment. Previous research showed that in 15%-30% of the ED patients, there is a difference between the primary diagnosis assigned by the emergency physician and the discharge diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the number and types of diagnostic discrepancies and to explore factors predicting discrepancies.

METHODS:

A retrospective record review was conducted in an academic medical center. The primary diagnosis assigned in the ED was compared with the discharge diagnosis after hospital admission. For each patient, we gathered additional information about the diagnostic process to identify possible predictors of diagnostic discrepancies.

RESULTS:

The electronic health records of 200 patients were reviewed. The primary diagnosis assigned in the ED was substantially different from the discharge diagnosis in 16.0%. These diagnostic discrepancies were associated with a higher number of additional diagnostics applied for (2.4 versus 2.0 diagnostics; P = 0.002) and longer stay in the ED (5.9 versus 4.7 hours; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS:

A difference between the diagnosis assigned by the emergency physician and the discharge diagnosis was found in almost 1 in 6 patients. The increased number of additional diagnostics and the longer stay at the ED in the group of patients with a diagnostic discrepancy suggests that these cases reflect the more difficult cases. More research should be done on predictive factors of diagnostic discrepancies.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diagnostic Errors / Emergency Service, Hospital Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Patient Saf Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diagnostic Errors / Emergency Service, Hospital Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Patient Saf Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United States