Recurrence of atypical and anaplastic intracranial Meningiomas: A meta-analysis of risk factors.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
; 244: 108450, 2024 Sep.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-39018991
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The predictive role of multiple risk factors for intracranial atypical and anaplastic meningioma recurrence is convoluted. This meta-analysis assessed the predictive value of selected factors for recurrence in these Meningiomas.METHODS:
Studies encompassing risk factor data including gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR), post-op radiotherapy, Ki-67â¯% index >3â¯%, and location were searched for in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, and thereafter analyzed using robust Bayesian meta-analysis.RESULTS:
Eighteen observational studies involving 1589 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. GTR was identified as a good prognostic factor for recurrence (OR = 0.212; 95â¯% CI (-1.972, -1.002); heterogeneity BF=0.702), and STR had a significantly higher risk of recurrence (OR = 4.43; 95â¯% CI 0.658-2.011; heterogeneity BF=0.724). Post-operative radiotherapy did not statistically significantly affect the recurrence process (OR = 1.02; 95â¯% CI (-1.848, 0.626); heterogeneity (BF=1.034)). Ki67â¯% index >3â¯% had an augmented chance of recurrence (OR = 2.38; 95â¯% CI (-0.220, 2.355); heterogeneity (BF=1.162)). A meta-regression analysis showed that WHO grade III Meningiomas had a higher chance of recurring than grade II Meningiomas.CONCLUSION:
Among the selected factors, STR and Ki67â¯% index > 3â¯% were associated with a higher risk of recurrence, with post-operative radiotherapy making no difference. GTR appeared to inversely impact recurrence. Compared to grade II, grade III Meningiomas had higher odds of recurring.Key words
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Meningeal Neoplasms
/
Meningioma
/
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Limits:
Humans
Language:
En
Journal:
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
Year:
2024
Document type:
Article
Country of publication:
Netherlands