Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcomes of over-the-top subscapularis repair in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Cueto, Robert J; Hao, Kevin A; O'Keefe, Daniel S; Mallat, Marlee A; Hones, Keegan M; Turnbull, Lacie M; Wright, Jonathan O; Soberon, Jose; Schoch, Bradley S; King, Joseph J.
Affiliation
  • Cueto RJ; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Hao KA; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • O'Keefe DS; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Mallat MA; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Hones KM; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Turnbull LM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Wright JO; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Soberon J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Florida South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Schoch BS; Department of Anesthesiology, North Florida Southern Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • King JJ; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
JSES Int ; 8(4): 866-872, 2024 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39035640
ABSTRACT

Background:

Biomechanical research demonstrates increased subscapularis abduction range of motion (ROM) when the tendon's upper two-thirds is repaired over-the-top of the center of rotation during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study compares the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing RSA with over-the-top subscapularis repair (OTTR) to patients without repair.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 97 consecutive RSAs with either OTTR of the subscapularis (N = 75) or no repair (N = 22). Repair was attempted in all patients but not performed if the subscapularis could not be brought to the over-the-top position in 20° of external rotation (ER) and 30° of abduction. Improvements in ROM were compared to the minimal clinically important difference for RSA.

Results:

The mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 1.6 years. Demographics were similar between groups. Preoperatively, patients undergoing repair had greater ER when compared to those without repair (15 ± 16° vs. 5 ± 12°, P = .003). Postoperatively, patients undergoing repair had greater forward elevation (132 ± 21° vs. 126 ± 22°, P = .268) and abduction (114 ± 26° vs. 106 ± 23°, P = .193) with both exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (-2.9° and -1.9°, respectively); however, not statistically significant. Patients with repair were more frequently able to reach the small of their back postoperatively (65% vs. 21%, P = .006) but had less improvement in ER (13 ± 20° vs. 24 ± 20°, P = .028). Postoperative outcome scores, complications, and reoperations were similar between groups.

Discussion:

OTTR of the subscapularis in RSA had similar ROM and outcome scores compared to no repair, but a significantly larger proportion of patients with repair achieved functional internal rotation to the small of the back. ER limitations seen after conventional repair may also apply to this novel technique, but without a corresponding detrimental effect on forward elevation or abduction.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: JSES Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: JSES Int Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: United States