Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accounting for minimum data required to train a machine learning model to accurately monitor Australian dairy pastures using remote sensing.
Correa-Luna, Martin; Gargiulo, Juan; Beale, Peter; Deane, David; Leonard, Jacob; Hack, Josh; Geldof, Zac; Wilson, Chloe; Garcia, Sergio.
Affiliation
  • Correa-Luna M; Dairy Science Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2567, Australia. martin.correa.luna@gmail.com.
  • Gargiulo J; NSW Department of Primary Industries, Menangle, NSW, 2568, Australia.
  • Beale P; Local Land Services, Hunter, Taree, NSW, 2430, Australia.
  • Deane D; Local Land Services, Hunter, Taree, NSW, 2430, Australia.
  • Leonard J; Local Land Services, Hunter, Taree, NSW, 2430, Australia.
  • Hack J; Ag Farming Systems, Hunter, Taree, NSW, 2430, Australia.
  • Geldof Z; Agricultural Consulting, Northern Rivers, NSW, 2480, Australia.
  • Wilson C; Dairy Science Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2567, Australia.
  • Garcia S; Dairy Science Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2567, Australia.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 16927, 2024 07 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043833
ABSTRACT
Precision in grazing management is highly dependent on accurate pasture monitoring. Typically, this is often overlooked because existing approaches are labour-intensive, need calibration, and are commonly perceived as inaccurate. Machine-learning processes harnessing big data, including remote sensing, can offer a new era of decision-support tools (DST) for pasture monitoring. Its application on-farm remains poor because of a lack of evidence about its accuracy. This study aimed at evaluating and quantifying the minimum data required to train a machine-learning satellite-based DST focusing on accurate pasture biomass prediction using this approach. Management data from 14 farms in New South Wales, Australia and measured pasture biomass throughout 12 consecutive months using a calibrated rising plate meter (RPM) as well as pasture biomass estimated using a DST based on high temporal/spatial resolution satellite images were available. Data were balanced according to farm and week of each month and randomly allocated for model evaluation (20%) and for progressive training (80%) as follows 25% training subset (1W week 1 in each month); 50% (2W week 1 and 3); 75% (3W week 1, 3, and 4); and 100% (4W week 1 to 4). Pasture biomass estimates using the DST across all training datasets were evaluated against a calibrated rising plate meter (RPM) using mean-absolute error (MAE, kg DM/ha) among other statistics. Tukey's HSD test was used to determine the differences between MAE across all training datasets. Relative to the control (no training, MAE 498 kg DM ha-1) 1W did not improve the prediction accuracy of the DST (P > 0.05). With the 2W training dataset, the MAE decreased to 342 kg DM ha-1 (P < 0.001), while for the other training datasets, MAE decreased marginally (P > 0.05). This study accounts for minimal training data for a machine-learning DST to monitor pastures from satellites with comparable accuracy to a calibrated RPM which is considered the 'gold standard' for pasture biomass monitoring.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomass / Dairying / Remote Sensing Technology / Machine Learning Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomass / Dairying / Remote Sensing Technology / Machine Learning Limits: Animals Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia Country of publication: United kingdom