Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Generating synthetic computed tomography for radiotherapy: SynthRAD2023 challenge report.
Huijben, Evi M C; Terpstra, Maarten L; Galapon, Arthur Jr; Pai, Suraj; Thummerer, Adrian; Koopmans, Peter; Afonso, Manya; van Eijnatten, Maureen; Gurney-Champion, Oliver; Chen, Zeli; Zhang, Yiwen; Zheng, Kaiyi; Li, Chuanpu; Pang, Haowen; Ye, Chuyang; Wang, Runqi; Song, Tao; Fan, Fuxin; Qiu, Jingna; Huang, Yixing; Ha, Juhyung; Sung Park, Jong; Alain-Beaudoin, Alexandra; Bériault, Silvain; Yu, Pengxin; Guo, Hongbin; Huang, Zhanyao; Li, Gengwan; Zhang, Xueru; Fan, Yubo; Liu, Han; Xin, Bowen; Nicolson, Aaron; Zhong, Lujia; Deng, Zhiwei; Müller-Franzes, Gustav; Khader, Firas; Li, Xia; Zhang, Ye; Hémon, Cédric; Boussot, Valentin; Zhang, Zhihao; Wang, Long; Bai, Lu; Wang, Shaobin; Mus, Derk; Kooiman, Bram; Sargeant, Chelsea A H; Henderson, Edward G A; Kondo, Satoshi.
Affiliation
  • Huijben EMC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Terpstra ML; Radiotherapy Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostics & Therapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Galapon AJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Pai S; Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Thummerer A; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Koopmans P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Afonso M; Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • van Eijnatten M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Gurney-Champion O; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Chen Z; School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zheng K; School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li C; School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Pang H; School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
  • Ye C; School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
  • Wang R; School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
  • Song T; Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Fan F; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Qiu J; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Huang Y; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Ha J; Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
  • Sung Park J; Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
  • Alain-Beaudoin A; Advanced Development Engineering, Elekta Ltd, Montreal, Canada.
  • Bériault S; Advanced Development Engineering, Elekta Ltd, Montreal, Canada.
  • Yu P; Infervision Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China.
  • Guo H; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shantou University, China.
  • Huang Z; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shantou University, China.
  • Li G; Independent researchers.
  • Zhang X; Independent researchers.
  • Fan Y; Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
  • Liu H; Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
  • Xin B; Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
  • Nicolson A; Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
  • Zhong L; Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Deng Z; Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Müller-Franzes G; University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
  • Khader F; University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
  • Li X; Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland; Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Zhang Y; Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland; Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hémon C; University Rennes 1, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI, Rennes, France.
  • Boussot V; University Rennes 1, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI, Rennes, France.
  • Zhang Z; Subtle Medical, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang L; Subtle Medical, Shanghai, China.
  • Bai L; MedMind Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
  • Wang S; MedMind Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
  • Mus D; MRI Guidance BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Kooiman B; MRI Guidance BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Sargeant CAH; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Henderson EGA; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Kondo S; Muroran Institute of Technology, Hokkaido, Japan.
Med Image Anal ; 97: 103276, 2024 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39068830
ABSTRACT
Radiation therapy plays a crucial role in cancer treatment, necessitating precise delivery of radiation to tumors while sparing healthy tissues over multiple days. Computed tomography (CT) is integral for treatment planning, offering electron density data crucial for accurate dose calculations. However, accurately representing patient anatomy is challenging, especially in adaptive radiotherapy, where CT is not acquired daily. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft-tissue contrast. Still, it lacks electron density information, while cone beam CT (CBCT) lacks direct electron density calibration and is mainly used for patient positioning. Adopting MRI-only or CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy eliminates the need for CT planning but presents challenges. Synthetic CT (sCT) generation techniques aim to address these challenges by using image synthesis to bridge the gap between MRI, CBCT, and CT. The SynthRAD2023 challenge was organized to compare synthetic CT generation methods using multi-center ground truth data from 1080 patients, divided into two tasks (1) MRI-to-CT and (2) CBCT-to-CT. The evaluation included image similarity and dose-based metrics from proton and photon plans. The challenge attracted significant participation, with 617 registrations and 22/17 valid submissions for tasks 1/2. Top-performing teams achieved high structural similarity indices (≥0.87/0.90) and gamma pass rates for photon (≥98.1%/99.0%) and proton (≥97.3%/97.0%) plans. However, no significant correlation was found between image similarity metrics and dose accuracy, emphasizing the need for dose evaluation when assessing the clinical applicability of sCT. SynthRAD2023 facilitated the investigation and benchmarking of sCT generation techniques, providing insights for developing MRI-only and CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy. It showcased the growing capacity of deep learning to produce high-quality sCT, reducing reliance on conventional CT for treatment planning.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med Image Anal Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med Image Anal Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: Netherlands