Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anticoagulation strategy for patients presenting with ischemic strokes while using a direct oral anticoagulant: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mota Telles, João Paulo; Cenci, Giulia Isadora; Marinheiro, Gabriel; Nager, Gabriela Borges; Rocha, Rebeka Bustamante; Bomtempo, Fernanda Ferreira; Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha; Sampaio Silva, Gisele.
Affiliation
  • Mota Telles JP; Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Cenci GI; Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Marinheiro G; School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Sobral, Brazil.
  • Nager GB; School of Medicine, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Rocha RB; School of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
  • Bomtempo FF; Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Figueiredo EG; Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sampaio Silva G; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Stroke ; : 17474930241270443, 2024 Aug 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075753
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

While direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have established efficacy in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke, they still leave a residual risk of stroke, which may be greater in practice (0.7-2.3%) than in controlled clinical trial settings. This meta-analysis examines four therapeutic approaches following a stroke in patients already on DOACs continuing with the same DOAC, changing to a different DOAC, increasing the current DOAC dosage, or switching to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), such as warfarin.

METHODS:

Systematic review of literature from the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases, was conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The analysis focused on six studies with varied patient demographics, examining as outcomes as recurrent ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, other bleeding events, and mortality.

RESULTS:

Six studies comprising 12,159 patients were included, all of them were observational. Patients who remained on their initial DOAC regimen had a lower risk of experiencing ischemic strokes (risk ratio (RR) 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.70; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.25-0.55; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), and hemorrhagic events (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30-0.63; p < 0.001; I2 = 6%) compared to those who were switched to warfarin, with an increase in mortality rates (hazard ratio (HR) 1.85; 95% CI 1.06-3.24; p = 0.03; I2 = 84%). In contrast, neither changing to a different DOAC nor adjusting the dose proved to be more effective than the original regimen.

CONCLUSION:

Post-stroke adjustments to anticoagulation therapy-whether altering the drug or its dosage-do not yield additional benefits. In addition, the results suggest that warfarin may be less effective than DOACs for preventing stroke recurrence, bleeding complications, and death in this patient population.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Stroke Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Stroke Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Country of publication: United States