Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of two pen-side tests for detecting African swine fever virus in experimentally infected pigs.
Vu, Hanh D; Luong, Hung Q; Lai, Huong T L; Nguyen, Hoa T; Pham, Trang H; Truong, Lam Q; Nguyen, Giap V; Vu, Hiep L X.
Affiliation
  • Vu HD; Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  • Luong HQ; Nebraska Center for Virology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.
  • Lai HTL; Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  • Nguyen HT; Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  • Pham TH; Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  • Truong LQ; Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  • Nguyen GV; Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  • Vu HLX; Department of Animal Science, Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA. hiepvu@unl.edu.
Arch Virol ; 169(8): 170, 2024 Jul 30.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080100
ABSTRACT
African swine fever virus (ASFV) has spread through many countries and regions worldwide, causing significant losses. Timely detection of ASFV-infected pigs is crucial for disease control. In this study, we assessed the performance of two pen-side tests a portable real-time PCR (qPCR) test for detecting viral genomic DNA and a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for detecting viral antigens. To determine the time from infection to the earliest detection, 10 ASFV-seronegative pigs were inoculated intramuscularly with 104.0 hemadsorption dose 50 of a highly virulent ASFV strain. Whole blood and oral swab samples were alternately collected from each group of five pigs daily until all succumbed to the infection. Samples were promptly subjected to the two pen-side tests upon collection, and a subset was transported to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory for analysis using a reference qPCR assay. Viral genomic DNA was consistently detected by the reference qPCR assay in all blood samples from 2 days postinfection (dpi), preceding the onset of clinical signs, and in oral swabs from 4 dpi onwards. The portable qPCR test demonstrated comparable performance to the reference qPCR assay for both whole blood and oral swab samples. The LFIA exhibited 100% specificity when testing with whole blood samples but showed reduced sensitivity, particularly for blood samples collected early or late after infection. The antigen test did not perform well with oral swabs.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sensitivity and Specificity / African Swine Fever / African Swine Fever Virus / Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Arch Virol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Vietnam

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sensitivity and Specificity / African Swine Fever / African Swine Fever Virus / Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Arch Virol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Vietnam