Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Derivation and validation of the Ottawa weight loss prediction model for patients on a low-calorie diet.
Dent, Robert R M; van Walraven, Carl.
Affiliation
  • Dent RRM; Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, OTTAWA, Canada.
  • van Walraven C; Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, ASB1-003 1053K1Y 4E9, Canada. carlv@ohri.ca.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 18120, 2024 08 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39103385
ABSTRACT
Accurate weight predictions are essential for weight management program patients. The freely available National Institutes of Health Body Weight Planner (NIH-BWP) returns expected weights over time but overestimates weight when patients consume a low-calorie diet. This study sought to increase the accuracy of NIH-BWP predicted weights for people on low-calorie diets. People enrolled in a weight management program were included if they received meal replacements with defined caloric content for the 3 months of the weight loss phase of the program. The Ottawa Weight Loss Prediction Model (OWL-PM) modelled the relative difference between observed and NIH-BWP predicted weights using longitudinal analysis methods based on patient factors. OWL-PM was externally validated. 1761 people were included (mean age 46 years, 73.3% women) with a mean (SD) baseline weight in pounds and body mass index of 271.9 (55.6) and 43.9 (7.4), respectively. At the end of the program's weight loss phase, people lost a median (IQR) of 17.1% (14.8-19.5) of their baseline weight. Observed weight relative to NIH-BWP predicted weights had a median value of - 4.9% but ranged from - 32.1% to + 28.5%. After adjustment, weight overestimation by NIH-BWP was most pronounced in male patients, people without diabetes and with increased observation time. OWL-PM returned expected weights at 3 months that were significantly more accurate than those from NIH-BWP alone (mean difference observed vs. expected [95% CI] 6.7lbs [6.4-7.0] vs. 12.6lbs [12.1-13.0]). In the external validation cohort (n = 106), OWL-PM was significantly more accurate than NIH-BWP (mean squared error 24.3 vs. 40.0, p = 0.0018). OWL-PM incorporated patient-level covariates to significantly increase weight prediction accuracy of NIH-BWP in patients consuming a low-calorie diet.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Weight Loss / Caloric Restriction Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Country of publication: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Weight Loss / Caloric Restriction Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Canada Country of publication: United kingdom