Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of Osteoarthritis Between ACL Reconstruction With Different Graft Types and Between ACL Reconstruction and Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Vendrig, Tom; Keizer, Michèle N J; Brouwer, Reinoud W; Hoogeslag, Roy A G.
Affiliation
  • Vendrig T; Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Keizer MNJ; Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Brouwer RW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Hoogeslag RAG; Centre for Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine OCON, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 12(8): 23259671241258775, 2024 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39157020
ABSTRACT

Background:

Variation in stiffness, fixation methods, and donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with different graft types and with anterior cruciate ligament suture repair (ACLSR) can lead to differences in dynamic knee laxity and consequent differences in posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) development.

Purpose:

To compare the incidence of PTOA between different graft types used for primary ACLR and between primary ACLR and ACLSR. It was hypothesized that the incidence of PTOA would vary between ACLR with different autografts and allografts and between ACLR and ACLSR. Study

Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods:

A search of the literature was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing radiographic evidence of PTOA after ACLR between different graft types-hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, and allograft-and between ACLR and ACLSR. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Study quality was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score. A meta-analysis was performed to determine whether there was a difference in the incidence of PTOA between the different graft types and between ACLR and ACLSR.

Results:

Eleven randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis-HT 440 patients (mean follow-up, 9.7 years); BPTB 307 patients (mean follow-up, 11.8 years); allograft 246 patients (mean follow-up, 5 years); ACLSR, 22 patients (5 years). No study reporting the incidence after ACLR with quadriceps tendon was included. The study quality ranged from 70 to 88. The meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in the incidence of PTOA between graft types used for ACLR and between ACLR and ACLSR (risk ratios HT vs BPTB, 1.05; HT vs allograft, 0.81; BPTB vs allograft, 0.82; HT vs ACLSR, not estimable [P > .05 for all]). The combined number of patients with PTOA in all studies per graft type showed that patients who underwent ACLR with a BPTB autograft had the highest percentage of PTOA (HT, 23.4%; BPTB, 29.6%; allograft, 8.1%; ACLSR, 0%). However, excluding studies with a follow-up <5 years resulted in similar outcomes for patients with an HT autograft and a BPTB autograft.

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis reported no difference in the incidence of PTOA between graft types used for ACLR and between ACLR and ACLSR. More research is necessary to make a reliable conclusion about which technique is associated with the lowest incidence of PTOA after ACL surgery.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands Country of publication: United States