Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CALL TO ECLS-Acronym for Reporting Patients for Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Procedure from Prehospital Setting to Destination Centers.
Sanak, Tomasz; Putowski, Mateusz; Dabrowski, Marek; Kwinta, Anna; Zawisza, Katarzyna; Morajda, Andrzej; Puslecki, Mateusz.
Affiliation
  • Sanak T; Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Cracow, Poland.
  • Putowski M; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital in Cracow, 30-688 Cracow, Poland.
  • Dabrowski M; Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Cracow, Poland.
  • Kwinta A; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital in Cracow, 30-688 Cracow, Poland.
  • Zawisza K; Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-317 Kielce, Poland.
  • Morajda A; Department of Medical Education, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.
  • Puslecki M; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital in Cracow, 30-688 Cracow, Poland.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(16)2024 Aug 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201171
ABSTRACT
The acronym CALL TO ECLS has been proposed as a potential tool to support decision-making in critical communication moments when qualifying a patient for the ECPR procedure. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of the acronym and validate its content. Validation is crucial to ensure that the acronym is theoretically correct and includes the necessary information that must be conveyed by EMS during the qualification of a patient with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest for ECMO. A survey was conducted using the LimeSurvey platform through the Survey Research System of the Jagiellonian University Medical College over a 6-month period (from December 2022 to May 2023). Usefulness, importance, clarity, and unambiguity were rated on a 4-point Likert scale, from 1 (not useful, not important, unclear, ambiguous) to 4 (useful, important, clear, unambiguous). On the 4-point scale, the Content Validity Index (I-CVI) was calculated as the percentage of subject matter experts who rated the criterion as having a level of importance/clarity/validity/uniqueness of 3 or 4. The Scale-level Content Validity Index (S-CVI) based on the average method was computed as the average of I-CVI scores (S-CVI-AVE) for all considered criteria (protocol). The number of fully completed surveys by experts was 35, and partial completion was obtained in 63 cases. All criteria were deemed significant/useful, with I-CVI coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.97. Similarly, the importance of all criteria was confirmed, as all I-CVI coefficients were greater than 0.78 (ranging from 0.83 to 0.97). The average I-CVI score for the ten considered criteria in terms of usefulness/significance and importance exceeded 0.9, indicating high validity of the tool/protocol/acronym. Based on the survey results and analysis of responses provided by experts, a second version was created, incorporating additional explanations. In Criterion 10, an explanation was added-"Signs of life"-during conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ROSC, motor response during CPR). It has been shown that the acronym CALL TO ECLS, according to experts, is accurate and contains the necessary content, and can serve as a system to facilitate communication between the pre-hospital environment and specialized units responsible for qualifying patients for the ECPR.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Poland Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Poland Country of publication: Switzerland