Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The link between structural brain asymmetry and the dimensions of the corpus callosum: A systematic review.
Dale, Caitlin; Kurth, Florian; Luders, Eileen.
Affiliation
  • Dale C; School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kurth F; School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
  • Luders E; School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study (SCAS), Uppsala, Sweden; Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. Electronic address: e.lueders@auckland.ac.nz.
Brain Res ; 1845: 149210, 2024 Aug 30.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39218333
ABSTRACT
Cerebral asymmetry is a defining feature of the human brain, but some controversy exists with respect to the relationship between structural brain asymmetry and the dimensions of the corpus callosum, the brain's major inter-hemispheric commissure. On the one hand, more asymmetric brains might house a proportionally smaller corpus callosum (negative link), potentially due to intra-hemispheric connections dominating over inter-hemispheric connections. On the other hand, asymmetric brains may contain a proportionately larger corpus callosum (positive link), to facilitate a possibly enhanced demand of interhemispheric communication, either through excitatory or inhibitory channels. The scientific literature on this topic is relatively sparse, but we have identified 13 studies that directly assess the relationship between structural asymmetries and callosal morphology. The studies suggest a multitude of effects on the global, regional, and local levels, where findings range from negative links, to positive links, to no links whatsoever. These links are systematically summarized, detailed, and discussed in the present review. Discrepancies between study outcomes might arise from the application of different morphometric approaches, the differential treatment of possible confounds, as well as the size and characteristics of the study sample.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Brain Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Brain Res Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand Country of publication: Netherlands