Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peer Review Is Primary: Presentations, Publications, Promotions, and Practice.
Campbell, Kendall M; Figueroa, Edgar; Baluchi, Donna; Rodríguez, José E.
Affiliation
  • Campbell KM; Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
  • Figueroa E; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Baluchi D; Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Rodríguez JE; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT.
PRiMER ; 8: 42, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39238487
ABSTRACT
Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: PRiMER Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: PRiMER Year: 2024 Document type: Article Country of publication: United States