Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prognostic nomogram for patients with HR+ mucinous breast carcinoma based on the SEER database and a Chinese cohort study.
Fang, Huiying; Yue, Jian; Li, Hongzhong; Luan, Tiankuo; Wang, Pin; Ren, Guosheng.
Affiliation
  • Fang H; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Yue J; Department of Breast Cancer Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Li H; Department of Breast Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Gaozhou, China.
  • Luan T; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Wang P; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Ren G; Center of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Third People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1444531, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39246320
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The study aimed to develop a nomogram model for individual prognosis prediction in patients with hormone receptors positive (HR+) mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) and assess the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in this context.

Methods:

A total of 6,850 HR+ MBC patients from the SEER database were identified and randomly (in a 73 ratio) divided into training cohorts and internal validation cohorts. 77 patients were enrolled from the Chongqing University Cancer Hospital as the external validation cohort. Independent risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) were selected using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, and nomogram models were constructed and validated. A propensity score matching (PSM) approach was used in the exploration of the value of NAC versus adjuvant chemocherapy (AC) for long-term prognosis in HR+ MBC patients.

Results:

Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed 8 independent prognostic factors age, race, marital status, tumor size, distant metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The constructed nomogram model based on these 8 factors exhibited good consistency and accuracy. In the training group, internal validation group and external validation group, the high-risk groups demonstrated worse OS (p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that NAC had no impact on OS (p = 0.18), or cancer specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.26) compared with AC after PSM.

Conclusions:

The established nomogram model provides an accurate prognostic prediction for HR+ MBC patients. NAC does not confer long-term survival benefits compared to AC. These findings provide a novel approach for prognostic prediction and clinical practice.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Oncol Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China Country of publication: Switzerland