Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Body Size Measurements Grouped Independently of Common Clinical Measures of Metabolic Health: An Exploratory Factor Analysis.
Ellison, Katie M; El Zein, Aseel; Reynolds, Chelsi; Ehrlicher, Sarah E; Clina, Julianne G; Chui, Tsz-Kiu; Smith, Kimberly A; Hill, James O; Wyatt, Holly R; Sayer, R Drew.
Affiliation
  • Ellison KM; Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
  • El Zein A; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Reynolds C; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Ehrlicher SE; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Clina JG; Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
  • Chui TK; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, MO 66103, USA.
  • Smith KA; Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
  • Hill JO; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Wyatt HR; Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
  • Sayer RD; Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Nutrients ; 16(17)2024 Aug 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39275189
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Obesity is commonly aggregated with indices of metabolic health. Proponents of body positivity approaches question whether body size is a determinant of health and well-being. Our objective was to conduct an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine if body size measurements factor load with or independent of metabolic health measures.

METHODS:

The EFA was conducted on n= 249 adults using baseline data from four weight loss trials (Sample 1 n = 40; Sample 2 n = 52; Sample 3 n = 53; Sample 4 n = 104). An EFA of nine items (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], HDL-cholesterol [HDL], LDL-cholesterol [LDL], total cholesterol [TC], body mass index [BMI], body fat percent BF%], and waist circumference [WC]) was conducted with oblique rotation.

RESULTS:

Three factors were retained, which produced a model explaining 87.5% of the variance. Six items loaded strongly (>0.8) under three components and were selected for retention (Factor 1 LDL and TC; Factor 2 BMI and WC; Factor 3 SBP and DBP).

CONCLUSION:

Body size measures loaded separately from measures of metabolic health and metabolic health were further split into lipid- and blood pressure-focused factors. These results support weight-neutral interventions to improve overall health and well-being.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Pressure / Body Mass Index / Waist Circumference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Nutrients Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Pressure / Body Mass Index / Waist Circumference Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Nutrients Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States Country of publication: Switzerland