Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Carbon emission from the Lower Ob River floodplain during spring flood.
Vorobyev, Sergey N; Kolesnichenko, Yuri; Karlsson, Jan; Pokrovsky, Oleg S.
Affiliation
  • Vorobyev SN; BIO-GEO-CLIM Laboratory, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.
  • Kolesnichenko Y; BIO-GEO-CLIM Laboratory, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.
  • Karlsson J; Climate Impacts Research Centre (CIRC), Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Linnaeus väg 6, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
  • Pokrovsky OS; Geosciences and Environment Toulouse, UMR 5563 CNRS, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France. Electronic address: oleg.pokrovsky@get.omp.eu.
Sci Total Environ ; 954: 176294, 2024 Sep 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39284442
ABSTRACT
Carbon emission from Arctic rivers constitutes a positive feedback between the climate warming and C cycle. However, in case of rivers with extensive floodplains, the impacts of temporary water bodies and secondary channels on CO2 exchange with atmosphere, compared to the main stem and tributaries, remain strongly understudied. In order to quantify the relative role of various water bodies of the Arctic river basin in the C cycle, the hydrochemical variables and greenhouse gases GHG concentrations and fluxes were measured within the floodplain of the largest Arctic River, Ob, in its low reaches located in the permafrost zone. These included the main stem, secondary channels, tributaries and floodplain lakes sampled over a 900 km north-south transect (25,736 km2 of the main stem and adjacent floodplain area; 7893 km2 water surface) during peak of spring flood (May 2023). In addition to main stem and tributaries, providing less than a half of overall C flux, floodplain lakes and secondary channels acted as important factor of C emission from the floodplain water surfaces. Multi-parametric statistical treatment of the data suggested two main processes of C emission from the Ob River floodplain waters terrestrial organic matter-rich flooded wetlands (fens) provided elevated pCO2, whereas the sites of possible groundwater discharge in the secondary channels decreased the CO2 fluxes due to more alkaline environments, rich in labile metals and anionic elements. Based on available high-resolution Landsat-8 images, which matched the period of field work, it was found that the total water coverage of the floodplain during spring 2023 was 30 % of overall territory, compared to 18 % during the baseflow. Based on chamber-measured CO2 fluxes (1.56 ± 0.47 g C-CO2 m-2 d-1), overall CO2 emissions during 2 months of the spring flood from the entire Lower Ob River floodplain water surfaces including the main stem amounted to 0.73 ± 0.25 Tg C. Diffuse CH4 flux represented <1 % of total C flux. The main stem of the Ob River accounted for 34 % and 18 % of CO2 and CH4 emissions, respectively, whereas the floodplain lakes provided 59 % and 50 % of CO2 and CH4 emission, respectively. Considering that the low reaches of the Ob River represent >70 % of total river basin floodplain, and that during some years, the entire floodplain can be covered by water, emissions from the river - if assessed solely from summer (July-August) measurements - can be at least 3 times underestimated. It is therefore important to account for extended water surface during high water levels on Arctic rivers when assessing global riverine C emissions.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Russia Country of publication: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Sci Total Environ Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Russia Country of publication: Netherlands