Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of RIGR and SVD dynamic imaging methods.
Hanson, J M; Liang, Z P; Magin, R L; Duerk, J L; Lauterbur, P C.
Affiliation
  • Hanson JM; Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 61801, USA.
Magn Reson Med ; 38(1): 161-7, 1997 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9211392
ABSTRACT
Several constrained imaging methods have recently been proposed for dynamic imaging applications. This paper compares two of these

methods:

the Reduced-encoding Imaging by Generalized-series Reconstruction (RIGR) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods. RIGR utilizes a priori data for optimal image reconstruction whereas the SVD method seeks to optimize data acquisition. However, this study shows that the existing SVD encoding method tends to bias the data acquisition scheme toward reproducing the known features in the reference image. This characteristic of the SVD encoding method reduces its capability to capture new image features and makes it less suitable than RIGR for dynamic imaging applications.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Magnetic Resonance Imaging Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 1997 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Magnetic Resonance Imaging Language: En Journal: Magn Reson Med Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 1997 Document type: Article Affiliation country: United States