Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do not resuscitate: an ethical dilemma for the decision-maker.
Birtwistle, J; Nielsen, A.
Affiliation
  • Birtwistle J; University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital.
Br J Nurs ; 7(9): 543-9, 1998.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9735712
ABSTRACT
Since its introduction in the 1960s, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been universally available to all hospital patients unless the consultant in charge has specified a 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) order. The public perception of CPR has tended to be one of overoptimism, but this is not matched by the low survival to discharge ratio of approximately 110. In addition, there is the risk of prolonging suffering, compared with the quick and relatively painfree alternative offered by cardiac arrest. Decisions about resuscitation pose many ethical dilemmas for those involved and should take into consideration the patient's wishes, prognosis and quality of life.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Resuscitation Orders / Decision Making / Ethics, Medical Aspects: Ethics / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Nurs Year: 1998 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Resuscitation Orders / Decision Making / Ethics, Medical Aspects: Ethics / Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Nurs Year: 1998 Document type: Article