A preliminary analysis of medical futility decisionmaking: law and professional attitudes.
Behav Sci Law
; 16(4): 497-508, 1998.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-9924768
ABSTRACT
Judicial decisions reviewed in this article indicate that courts have taken two disparate approaches to disputes over futility of treatment. To explore whether a consensus on medical futility is developing among hospitals, the authors conducted a nationwide survey of health care professionals at hospitals. Respondents assigned importance ratings to factors used in recent futility decisions made at their institutions. The resulting importance ratings showed significant variation by characteristics of the institution (comparing respondents from for-profit, not-for-profit, and government hospitals) and by profession of the respondent (comparing physicians and nurses). The respondents' judgments endorsed three distinct strategies for making futility decisions (i.e., emphasis on the patient's decision preferences, providing for the patient and family, and adhering to objective medical and social norms).
Search on Google
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Personnel, Hospital
/
Attitude of Health Personnel
/
Medical Futility
/
Decision Making
/
Life Support Care
Type of study:
Prognostic_studies
/
Qualitative_research
Limits:
Humans
Country/Region as subject:
America do norte
Language:
En
Journal:
Behav Sci Law
Year:
1998
Document type:
Article
Affiliation country:
United States