This article is a Preprint
Preprints are preliminary research reports that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Preprints posted online allow authors to receive rapid feedback and the entire scientific community can appraise the work for themselves and respond appropriately. Those comments are posted alongside the preprints for anyone to read them and serve as a post publication assessment.
ApharSeq: An Extraction-free Early-Pooling Protocol for Massively Multiplexed SARS-CoV-2 Detection
Preprint
in En
| PREPRINT-MEDRXIV
| ID: ppmedrxiv-20170746
ABSTRACT
The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic created a dire need for viral detection tests worldwide. Most current tests for SARS-CoV-2 are based on RNA extraction followed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR assays. While automation and improved logistics increased the capacity of these tests, they cannot exceed the lower bound dictated by one extraction and one RT-PCR reaction per sample. Multiplexed next generation sequencing (NGS) assays provide a dramatic increase in throughput, and hold the promise of richer information including viral strains, host immune response, and multiple pathogens. Here, we establish a significant improvement of existing RNA-seq detection protocols. Our workflow, ApharSeq, includes a fast and cheap RNA capture step, that is coupled to barcoding of individual samples, followed by sample-pooling prior to the reverse transcription, PCR and massively parallel sequencing. Thus, only one non-enzymatic step is performed before pooling hundreds of barcoded samples for subsequent steps and further analysis. We characterize the quantitative aspects of the assay by applying ApharSeq to more than 500 clinical samples in a robotic workflow. The assay results are linear, and the empirical limit of detection is found to be Ct 33 (roughly 1000 copies/ml). A single ApharSeq test currently costs under 1.2$, and we estimate costs can further go down 3-10 fold. Similarly, we estimate a labor reduction of 10-100 fold, automated liquid handling of 5-10 fold, and reagent requirement reduction of 20-1000 fold compared to existing testing methods.
cc_by_nc_nd
Full text:
1
Collection:
09-preprints
Database:
PREPRINT-MEDRXIV
Type of study:
Prognostic_studies
Language:
En
Year:
2020
Document type:
Preprint