Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of accuracy, exclusivity, limit-of-detection and ease-of-use of LumiraDx™ - Antigen-detecting point-of-care device for SARS-CoV-2
Lisa Johanna Krüger; Julian A.F. Klein; Frank Tobian; Mary Gaeddert; Federica Lainati; Sarah Klemm; Paul Schnitzler; Ralf Bartenschlager; Berati Cerikan; Christopher Neufeldt; Olga Nikolai; Andreas Lindner; Frank P. Mockenhaupt; Joachim Seybold; Terry C. Jones; Victor Max Corman; Nira M Pollock; Britta Knorr; Andreas Welker; Margaretha de Vos; Jilian A Sacks; Claudia M. Denkinger.
Affiliation
  • Lisa Johanna Krüger; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Julian A.F. Klein; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Frank Tobian; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Mary Gaeddert; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Federica Lainati; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Sarah Klemm; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Paul Schnitzler; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Ralf Bartenschlager; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Berati Cerikan; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Christopher Neufeldt; University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Olga Nikolai; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
  • Andreas Lindner; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
  • Frank P. Mockenhaupt; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
  • Joachim Seybold; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
  • Terry C. Jones; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
  • Victor Max Corman; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health
  • Nira M Pollock; Boston Children's Hospital
  • Britta Knorr; Department of Public Health Rhein Neckar Region
  • Andreas Welker; Department of Public Health Rhein Neckar Region
  • Margaretha de Vos; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
  • Jilian A Sacks; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
  • Claudia M. Denkinger; University Hospital Heidelberg
Preprint in En | PREPRINT-MEDRXIV | ID: ppmedrxiv-21252430
Journal article
A scientific journal published article is available and is probably based on this preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See journal article
ABSTRACT
BackgroundRapid antigen-detecting tests (Ag-RDTs) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can transform pandemic control. Thus far, sensitivity ([≤]85%) of lateral-flow assays has limited scale-up. Conceivably, microfluidic immunofluorescence Ag-RDTs could increase sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Materials and MethodsThis multi-centre diagnostic accuracy study investigated performance of the microfluidic immunofluorescence LumiraDx assay, enrolling symptomatic and asymptomatic participants with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants collected a supervised nasal mid-turbinate (NMT) self-swab for Ag-RDT testing, in addition to a professionally-collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swab for routine testing with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results were compared to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Sub-analyses investigated the results by viral load, symptom presence and duration. An analytical study assessed exclusivity and limit-of-detection (LOD). In addition, we evaluated ease-of-use. ResultsStudy conduct was between November 2nd 2020 and January 21st 2021. 761 participants were enrolled, with 486 participants reporting symptoms on testing day. 120 out of 146 RT-PCR positive cases were detected positive by LumiraDx, resulting in a sensitivity of 82.2% (95% CI 75.2%-87.5%). Specificity was 99.3% (CI 98.3-99.7%). Sensitivity was increased in individuals with viral load [≥] 7 log10 SARS-CoV2 RNA copies/ml (93.8%; CI 86.2%-97.3%). Testing against common respiratory commensals and pathogens showed no cross-reactivity and LOD was estimated to be 2-56 PFU/mL. The ease-of-use-assessment was favourable for lower throughput settings. ConclusionThe LumiraDx assay showed excellent analytical sensitivity, exclusivity and clinical specificity with good clinical sensitivity using supervised NMT self-sampling.
License
cc_by_nc
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Language: En Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint
Full text: 1 Collection: 09-preprints Database: PREPRINT-MEDRXIV Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Experimental_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Rct Language: En Year: 2021 Document type: Preprint